IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v58y2021i3p887-901.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Future of the Corporation and the Economics of Purpose

Author

Listed:
  • Colin Mayer

Abstract

This article examines the economic underpinnings of the concept of corporate purpose, which has gained increasing attention from business academics, practitioners and policymakers. It argues that there are fundamental reasons for reconceptualizing the purpose of business in the future which derive from the changing nature of business and the market failures to which it gives rise. It suggests that regulation is proving increasingly inadequate at correcting market failures, and the traditional separation between economic efficiency and distribution that underpins policy formulation is untenable. Instead, the article sets out how appropriately defined notions of corporate purpose can help to promote not only better social outcomes but also enhanced functioning of firms and markets. It describes a set of principles that provide a comprehensive framework for reforming business around credible commitments to corporate purpose. The reformulation of the corporation has profound implications for the macroeconomic performance of economies as well as the microeconomics of firms and markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Colin Mayer, 2021. "The Future of the Corporation and the Economics of Purpose," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 887-901, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:58:y:2021:i:3:p:887-901
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.12660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12660
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.12660?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donal PALCIC & Eoin REEVES & Matti SIEMIATYCKI, 2019. "Performance: The Missing ‘P’ In Ppp Research?," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(2), pages 221-226, June.
    2. Bishop, Matthew & Kay, John & Mayer, Colin (ed.), 1994. "Privatization and Economic Performance," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198773443.
    3. John C. Coffee Jr, 2017. "Preserving the corporate superego in a time of stress: an essay on ethics and economics," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(2), pages 221-256.
    4. Rebecca Henderson & Eric Van den Steen, 2015. "Why Do Firms Have "Purpose"? The Firm's Role as a Carrier of Identity and Reputation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 326-330, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muel Kaptein, 2023. "A Paradox of Ethics: Why People in Good Organizations do Bad Things," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 297-316, April.
    2. Allen, Franklin & Qian, Meijun & Xie, Jing, 2022. "Implicit benefits and financing," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    3. Nikolai Brosch, 2023. "Corporate purpose: from a ‘Tower of Babel’ phenomenon towards construct clarity," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 567-595, May.
    4. Trotter, Philipp A. & Brophy, Aoife, 2022. "Policy mixes for business model innovation: The case of off-grid energy for sustainable development in sub-Saharan Africa," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    5. Diane Coyle, 2021. "The idea of productivity," Working Papers 003, The Productivity Institute.
    6. Md. Mahiuddin Sabbir & Khan Md Raziuddin Taufique, 2022. "Sustainable employee green behavior in the workplace: Integrating cognitive and non‐cognitive factors in corporate environmental policy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 110-128, January.
    7. Robert Hurley, 2023. "An Organizational Capacity for Trustworthiness: A Dynamic Routines Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(3), pages 589-601, December.
    8. Francesca Collevecchio & Gianluca Gionfriddo, 2023. "Adopting a social purpose in for-profit firms: the role of the board of directors," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1467-1499, September.
    9. Gregor Bouville & Jocelyne Barreau, 2021. "Les Utopies Du Travail Et Le Management : Du 19e Au 21e Siecles," Post-Print halshs-03403834, HAL.
    10. Joan Enric Ricart & Carlos Rey, 2022. "Purpose in Corporate Governance: The Path towards a More Sustainable World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-11, April.
    11. Braganza, Oliver, 2022. "Market paternalism: Do people really want to be nudged towards consumption?," ifso working paper series 23, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Socioeconomics (ifso).
    12. Martin Ritter & Heiner Schanz, 2021. "Carsharing Business Models’ Strategizing Mindsets Regarding Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Hasbullah & Hasanuddin & Muh. Riswandi, 2022. "Performance of Food Distribution Institutions in Realizing Price Stability and Access to Rice Food at The Household Level of Farming Group in Bantaeng Regency," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(7), pages 582-587, July.
    14. Ricardo Zózimo & Miguel Pina e Cunha & Arménio Rego, 2023. "Becoming a Fraternal Organization: Insights from the Encyclical Fratelli Tutti," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 383-399, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ina Ganguli & Marieke Huysentruyt & Chloé Le Coq, 2021. "How Do Nascent Social Entrepreneurs Respond to Rewards? A Field Experiment on Motivations in a Grant Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6294-6316, October.
    2. Sun-Moon Jung & Jae Yong Shin, 2022. "Social Performance Incentives in Mission-Driven Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(10), pages 7631-7657, October.
    3. Andrew Powell, 1996. "Sobre la reestructuración, regulación y competencia en el sector de servicios públicos: experiencia del Reino Unido y sus implicaciones para América Latina," Research Department Publications 4039, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    4. Sebastian Hauptmeier & Martin Heipertz & Ludger Schuknecht, 2007. "Expenditure Reform in Industrialised Countries: A Case-Study Approach," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 28(3), pages 293-342, September.
    5. Giorgio Mion & Cristian R. Loza Adaui, 2020. "Understanding the purpose of benefit corporations: an empirical study on the Italian case," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Burbano, Vanessa & Padilla, Nicolas & Meier, Stephan, 2020. "Gender Differences in Preferences for Meaning at Work," IZA Discussion Papers 13053, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Erdogdu, Erkan, 2007. "Regulatory reform in Turkish energy industry: An analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 984-993, February.
    8. Guangrong Dai & E. Susanne Blazek & Signe M. Spencer, 2020. "They who Have a “Why†to Live for: Purpose Facilitates Positive Employment Experience," Proceedings of the 17th International RAIS Conference, June 1-2, 2020 001geb, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    9. van Mierlo, J.G.A., 1995. "The quest for public management reform : theory and practice in the case of The Netherlands 1970-1995," Research Memorandum 015, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    10. Lea Cassar & Stephan Meier, 2017. "Intentions for Doing Good Matter for Doing Well: The (Negative) Signaling Value of Prosocial Incentives," NBER Working Papers 24109, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Ai Tee Loh & Booi Hon Kam & John T. Jackson, 2003. "Sri Lanka's plantation sector: a before-and-after privatization comparison," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(6), pages 727-745.
    12. Rim Lahmandi-Ayed & Didier Laussel, 2020. "A voting model of privatization," Working Papers hal-02504990, HAL.
    13. Emel Kahya, Sungsoo Kim, 2018. "Aristotle on Economics and Ethics," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(6), pages 23-32, November.
    14. Rebecca Henderson, 2021. "Innovation in the 21st Century: Architectural Change, Purpose, and the Challenges of Our Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5479-5488, September.
    15. Newbery, David & Affuso, Luisa, 2000. "Investment, Reprocurement and Franchise Contract Length in the British Railway Industry," CEPR Discussion Papers 2619, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Claude Laurin & Anthony E. Boardman & Aidan R. Vining, 2004. "Government Underpricing of Share‐Issue Privatizations," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 399-429, September.
    17. Anjan V. Thakor, 2021. "Ethics, Culture, and Higher Purpose in Banking: Post-Crisis Governance Developments," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 17(71), pages 1-31, December.
    18. Friedrich Schneider, 2001. "Privatisierung und Deregulierung in Österreich in den 90er Jahren: Einige Anmerkungen aus Sicht der Neuen Politischen Ökonomie," Economics working papers 2001-06, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    19. Bel, Gema, 1998. "Privatization on the stock market: Sale at one go or sale in tranches?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 113-117, January.
    20. Vanessa C. Burbano, 2016. "Social Responsibility Messages and Worker Wage Requirements: Field Experimental Evidence from Online Labor Marketplaces," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 1010-1028, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:58:y:2021:i:3:p:887-901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.