IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v50y2019i4p348-361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the fluid boundary between ‘legitimate performance management’ and ‘downward bullying’: an experimental approach

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew R. Timming
  • Michael T. French
  • Di Fan

Abstract

Using an experimental design, this research examines the extent to which managers and employees perceive management behaviours differently. Eight simulated employment scenarios were presented to an aggregated sample of managers and non‐managerial employees (n = 435), and the respondents were asked to evaluate the extent to which the behaviours depicted are seen as bullying. It was found that employees are more likely than managers to perceive ‘legitimate performance management’ as bullying but also that managers are more likely than employees to perceive more overt bullying as bullying per se. This divergence in perceptions suggests that what constitutes bullying, ontologically speaking, depends on one's point of view and implies that reality is socially constructed. The research has important implications for organisations and trade unions in the development of bullying policies and procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew R. Timming & Michael T. French & Di Fan, 2019. "Exploring the fluid boundary between ‘legitimate performance management’ and ‘downward bullying’: an experimental approach," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(4), pages 348-361, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:50:y:2019:i:4:p:348-361
    DOI: 10.1111/irj.12262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12262
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irj.12262?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:50:y:2019:i:4:p:348-361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.