IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v39y2024i2p593-601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of stakeholder structure in fostering community ownership: A case study of community‐based projects

Author

Listed:
  • Yurie Kobashi
  • Aya Goto
  • Chunhuei Chi

Abstract

Community health projects have played a crucial role in improving health issues. Listening to communities' voices and achieving community ownership are essential for conducting effective health projects. However, there are limited studies on the frameworks for collecting, aggregating, and operationalizing community preferences and values. In this study, we selected two cases of community field surveys from Japan and Cambodia to discuss who may represent a community and propose a practical approach to achieving community ownership. Both cases involved various stakeholders. From the insights of these two cases, we suggested the following three key components in the community project: the community representative, the communicator, and the institute outside the community. Notably, the community representative's role as the community's direct voice should be properly recognized and institutionalised to establish community ownership. We proposed the following key terms of the qualifications of community representatives: they should be able to represent voices from the community, should have extensive experience to decide the project direction and manage the project, and should be independent of outside actors. Our theoretical model of the structure of different stakeholder groups in community‐based projects will be helpful to accelerate community capacity strengthening; moreover, it can help build the appropriate community institution and process, including multi‐stakeholder groups to promote community ownership in health programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Yurie Kobashi & Aya Goto & Chunhuei Chi, 2024. "The role of stakeholder structure in fostering community ownership: A case study of community‐based projects," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 593-601, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:39:y:2024:i:2:p:593-601
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3750
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3750?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:39:y:2024:i:2:p:593-601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.