IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v39y2024i2p563-570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of an acute trust Domestic Abuse Coordinator role: Impact findings and a budget impact model

Author

Listed:
  • G. J. Melendez‐Torres
  • Louise Crathorne
  • Eleanor Hepworth
  • Vanessa Sloane
  • Sally Jackson
  • Rachel Nicholas
  • Charlotte E. Cohen

Abstract

Domestic Abuse Coordinators (DACs) work strategically across National Health Service (NHS) hospital and other off‐site clinical settings to support clinical staff in domestic abuse enquiry and response, and to co‐lead the development and implementation of effective clinical policies and procedures for the management of domestic abuse and the support of survivors. Drawing on data from a large NHS acute trust in central London, we analyse the impact of the DAC role in increasing the rate of referrals of high‐risk domestic abuse cases, and generate plausible estimates of the budget impact of the DAC role in respect of costs accrued to NHS trusts. Using eight quarters of clinical data and an interrupted time series design, we find that evidence that implementation of a DAC role is linked with an increase in the rate of high‐risk referrals of between 18% and 21% per quarter, indicating improved responses to victim‐survivors at highest risk of imminent harm. Under a range of reasonable assumptions, initiation of the DAC role is shown to be cost‐saving to an employing acute trust. Future work should seek to quantify the direct impacts to survivor health and wellbeing of the implementation of the DAC role.

Suggested Citation

  • G. J. Melendez‐Torres & Louise Crathorne & Eleanor Hepworth & Vanessa Sloane & Sally Jackson & Rachel Nicholas & Charlotte E. Cohen, 2024. "Evaluation of an acute trust Domestic Abuse Coordinator role: Impact findings and a budget impact model," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 563-570, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:39:y:2024:i:2:p:563-570
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3729
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3729?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:39:y:2024:i:2:p:563-570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.