IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v39y2024i2p380-396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The experience of Australian aged care workers during a trial implementation of a palliative care outcomes programme

Author

Listed:
  • Esther L. Davis
  • Judy Mullan
  • Claire E. Johnson
  • Sabina Clapham
  • Barbara Daveson
  • Gaye Bishop
  • Malene Ahern
  • Alanna Connolly
  • Walter Davis
  • Kathy Eagar

Abstract

End of life care is an essential part of the role of Australian aged care homes (ACHs). However, there is no national framework to support aged care staff in systematically identifying residents with palliative care needs or to routinely assess, respond to, and measure end of life needs. The Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC) is a national outcomes and benchmarking programme which aims to systematically improve palliative care for people who are approaching the end of life, and for their families and carers. The PCOC Wicking Model for Residential Aged Care was developed and piloted in four Australian ACHs. This paper reports on the qualitative findings from semi‐structured interviews and focus groups conducted with ACH staff (N = 37) to examine feasibility. Thematic analysis identified three overarching themes about the pilot: (i) processes to successfully prepare and support ACHs; (ii) appropriateness of PCOC tools for the ACH setting; and (iii) realised and potential benefits of the model for ACHs. The lessons presented valuable insights to refine the PCOC Wicking Model and enrich understanding of the potential challenges and solutions for implementing similar programs within ACHs in future. The results suggest that key to successfully preparing ACHs for implementation of the PCOC Wicking Model is an authentic and well‐paced collaborative approach with ACHs to ensure the resources, structures and systems are in place and appropriate for the setting. The PCOC Wicking Model for Residential Aged Care is a promising prototype to support ACHs in improving palliative and end of life care outcomes for residents and their carers.

Suggested Citation

  • Esther L. Davis & Judy Mullan & Claire E. Johnson & Sabina Clapham & Barbara Daveson & Gaye Bishop & Malene Ahern & Alanna Connolly & Walter Davis & Kathy Eagar, 2024. "The experience of Australian aged care workers during a trial implementation of a palliative care outcomes programme," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 380-396, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:39:y:2024:i:2:p:380-396
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3731
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3731
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3731?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:39:y:2024:i:2:p:380-396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.