IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v38y2023i5p1360-1376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building referral mechanisms for neonatal care in humanitarian emergency settings: A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Spencer Rutherford
  • Maryan Naman
  • Nabila Zaka
  • Kathryn Michaux
  • Meghan A. Cupp
  • Hannah Hafezi
  • Samira Sami
  • Emma C. Alexander
  • Monica Lakhanpaul
  • Logan Manikam

Abstract

Aim During humanitarian emergencies, women and children are particularly vulnerable to health complications and neonatal mortality rates have been shown to rise. Additionally, health cluster partners face challenges in coordinating referrals, both between communities and camps to health facilities and across different levels of health facilities. The purpose of this review was to identify the primary referral needs of neonates during humanitarian emergencies, current gaps and barriers, and effective mechanisms for overcoming these barriers. Methods A systematic review was performed using four electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, and Scopus) between June and August 2019 (PROSPERO registration number CRD42019127705). Title, abstract, and full text screening were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses. The target population was neonates born during humanitarian emergencies. Studies from high‐income countries and prior to 1991 were excluded. The STROBE checklist was used to assess for risk of bias. Results A total of 11 articles were included in the analysis; these were mainly cross‐sectional, field‐based studies. The primary needs identified were referrals from homes to health facilities before and during labour, and inter‐facility referrals after labour to more specialised services. Some of the main barriers included a lack of roads and infrastructure for transport, staff shortages—especially among more specialised services, and a lack of knowledge among patients for self‐referral. Mechanisms for addressing these needs and gaps included providing training for community healthcare workers (CHWs) or traditional birth attendants to identify and address antenatal and post‐natal complications; education programmes for pregnant women during the antenatal period; and establishing ambulance services in partnership with local Non‐Governmental Organizations. Conclusion This review benefited from a strong consensus among selected studies but was limited in the quality of data and types of data that were reported. Based on the above findings, the following recommendations were compiled: Focus on local capacity‐building programmes to address programmes acutely. Recruit CHWs to raise awareness of neonatal complications among pregnant women. Upskill CHWs to provide timely, appropriate and quality care during humanitarian emergencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Spencer Rutherford & Maryan Naman & Nabila Zaka & Kathryn Michaux & Meghan A. Cupp & Hannah Hafezi & Samira Sami & Emma C. Alexander & Monica Lakhanpaul & Logan Manikam, 2023. "Building referral mechanisms for neonatal care in humanitarian emergency settings: A systematic review," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1360-1376, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:38:y:2023:i:5:p:1360-1376
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3655
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3655?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:38:y:2023:i:5:p:1360-1376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.