IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v38y2023i5p1184-1211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How can scope of practice be described and conceptualised in medical and health professions? A systematic review for scoping and content analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Sharon Downie
  • Jill Walsh
  • Andrea Kirk‐Brown
  • Terry P. Haines

Abstract

Background The term scope of practice (SOP) refers to the limits of a health professional's knowledge, skills and experience and reflects all tasks and activities they undertake within the context of their professional role. Inconsistency in definitions of SOP contributes to uncertainty and confusion regarding professional practice boundaries and potentially impacts societal access to safe, effective and efficient healthcare options. The aim of this paper is to understand the conceptual diversity that may exist in terminology used to describe medical, nursing/midwifery and allied health SOP within an Australian practice context exemplar. Methods A systematic review for scoping and content analysis of SOP definitions and concepts, involving inductive thematic analysis and synthesis of published and grey literature. Results The initial search strategy yielded 11,863 hits, of which 379 were suitable for inclusion. Data coding identified various SOP terms and definitions and the emergence of six, conceptual elements underpinning the theoretical construct. These were subsequently proposed as a preliminary conceptual model (‘Solar’) to explain how the six conceptual elements may be applied across various professions, clinical settings and jurisdictions to better understand and address current and evolving SOP issues. Conclusion The findings of this study highlight limited consistency in SOP definitions and terminology within a single jurisdiction, and the conceptual complexity of the underlying theoretical construct. Further research is required to build on the proposed ‘Solar’ conceptual model and create a universal SOP definition across jurisdictions, to enhance understanding of the importance of SOP to workforce policy, clinical governance, service models and patient outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharon Downie & Jill Walsh & Andrea Kirk‐Brown & Terry P. Haines, 2023. "How can scope of practice be described and conceptualised in medical and health professions? A systematic review for scoping and content analysis," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1184-1211, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:38:y:2023:i:5:p:1184-1211
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3678
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3678?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:38:y:2023:i:5:p:1184-1211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.