IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v37y2022i6p3103-3125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of health system performance in Germany: Survey‐based insights into the perspective of people with private health insurance

Author

Listed:
  • Katharina Achstetter
  • Miriam Blümel
  • Julia Köppen
  • Philipp Hengel
  • Reinhard Busse

Abstract

Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) defined intermediate and overall goals to assess the performance of health systems. As the population perspective becomes more important for improving health systems, the aim of this study was to gain insights into the perspective of people with private health insurance (PHI) in Germany along the predefined WHO goals. Methods A cross‐sectional survey was conducted in 2018 among people with PHI in Germany. The questionnaire included items on all intermediate (access, coverage, quality, and safety) and overall WHO goals (improved health, responsiveness, social and financial risk protection, and improved efficiency). Descriptive analyses were conducted for the total sample and subgroups (gender, age, income, and health status). Results In total, 3601 respondents (age 58.5 ± 14.6; 64.7% male) assessed the German health system. For example, 3.3%–7.5% of the respondents with subjective needs reported forgone care in the past 12 months due to waiting time, distance, or financial reasons and 14.4% suspected medical errors in their care. During the last physician visit 94.2% experienced respectful treatment but only 60.6% perceived coordination of care as good. Unnecessary health services were perceived by 24.2%. For many items significant subgroup differences were found, particularly for age groups (18–64 vs. 65+). Conclusion Conducting a health system performance assessment from the population perspective gained new and unique insights into the perception of people with PHI in Germany. Areas to improve the health system were seen in, for example, coordination of care, financial risk protection, and quality of care, and inequalities between subgroups were identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Katharina Achstetter & Miriam Blümel & Julia Köppen & Philipp Hengel & Reinhard Busse, 2022. "Assessment of health system performance in Germany: Survey‐based insights into the perspective of people with private health insurance," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 3103-3125, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:37:y:2022:i:6:p:3103-3125
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3541
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3541?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:37:y:2022:i:6:p:3103-3125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.