IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v14y2023i1p72-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Big Four and corporate tax governance: From global dis‐harmony to national regulatory incrementalism

Author

Listed:
  • Ainsley Elbra
  • John Mikler
  • Hannah Murphy‐Gregory

Abstract

The Big Four professional services firms – PwC, Deloitte, KPMG and EY – promote, sanction, and regularise the behaviour and practices of business and government. This is especially the case in the area of multinational tax avoidance. This large, and growing, sector of the Big Four's business model places them at the centre of both causing and addressing the problem. Their role is not limited to advising MNCs on complex tax structures. They also advise governments and international organisations on regulatory reform of the global tax system. This article examines their role in so doing through an analysis of Australian Senate Inquiry hearings and responses to the OECD reform programme on the digitalisation of the economy. We show that advice provided by the Big Four is not purely technical, but is intended to achieve a global corporate tax system that is either globally dis‐harmonised or a matter of national regulatory incrementalism. This is despite their claims of supporting global regulation based on multilateral agreements. Ultimately, we demonstrate that the Big Four use their significant structural power to discursively undermine the ideals of the OECD, the leading international organisation working to reform global taxation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ainsley Elbra & John Mikler & Hannah Murphy‐Gregory, 2023. "The Big Four and corporate tax governance: From global dis‐harmony to national regulatory incrementalism," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 72-83, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:1:p:72-83
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13150
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13150?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anesa, Mattia & Gillespie, Nicole & Spee, A. Paul & Sadiq, Kerrie, 2019. "The legitimation of corporate tax minimization," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 17-39.
    2. Suddaby, Roy & Cooper, David J. & Greenwood, Royston, 2007. "Transnational regulation of professional services: Governance dynamics of field level organizational change," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(4-5), pages 333-362.
    3. Corlin Christensen, Rasmus & Hearson, Martin, 2019. "The New Politics of Global Tax Governance: Taking Stock a Decade After the Financial Crisis," Working Papers 14584, Institute of Development Studies, International Centre for Tax and Development.
    4. Rasmus Corlin Christensen & Martin Hearson, 2019. "The new politics of global tax governance: taking stock a decade after the financial crisis," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(5), pages 1068-1088, September.
    5. Kalaitzake, Manolis, 2019. "Accounting for success: The Big Four as allies of finance in post crisis regulatory reform," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(3), pages 297-326, September.
    6. Luc Fransen & Genevieve LeBaron, 2019. "Big audit firms as regulatory intermediaries in transnational labor governance," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 260-279, June.
    7. David L. Levy & Daniel Egan, 1998. "Capital Contests: National and Transnational Channels of Corporate Influence on the Climate Change Negotiations," Politics & Society, , vol. 26(3), pages 337-361, September.
    8. Andre Gunder Frank, 1978. "Dependent Accumulation and Underdevelopment," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-16014-3, September.
    9. Carlos Ramirez, 2012. "How Big Four Audit Firms Control Standard-Setting in Accounting and Auditing," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Isabelle Huault & Chrystelle Richard (ed.), Finance: The Discreet Regulator, chapter 2, pages 40-58, Palgrave Macmillan.
    10. David L. Levy & Peter J. Newell, 2002. "Business Strategy and International Environmental Governance: Toward a Neo-Gramscian Synthesis," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 2(4), pages 84-101, November.
    11. Stephen Wilks, 2013. "The Political Power of the Business Corporation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14186.
    12. Peter Nolan, 2001. "China and the Global Business Revolution," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-52410-1, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ainsley Elbra & John Mikler, 2017. "Paying a ‘Fair Share’: Multinational Corporations’ Perspectives on Taxation," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(2), pages 181-190, May.
    2. Rasmus Corlin Christensen & Leonard Seabrooke & Duncan Wigan, 2022. "Professional action in global wealth chains," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 705-721, July.
    3. Ainsley Elbra, 2020. "Fool’s Gold: Business Power and the Evolution of the Conflict‐free Gold Standard," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(3), pages 336-346, May.
    4. Petr Janský, 2023. "Corporate Effective Tax Rates for Research and Policy," Public Finance Review, , vol. 51(2), pages 171-205, March.
    5. Elena N. Timchenko & Alexander I. Pogorletsky, 2022. "Property Taxation: Transformational Changes in the Digital Era and Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 3, pages 28-43, June.
    6. Anesa, Mattia & Bressan, Alessandro, 2024. "SMEs tax minimization as shared responsibility," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    7. Csaba Lentner & Szilárd Hegedűs & Vitéz Nagy, 2022. "Correlations of Taxation and Macroeconomic Indicators in the OECD Member Countries from 2014 to the First Year of the Crisis Caused by COVID-19," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Akira Matsuoka, 2021. "The new international tax regime: analysis from a power-basis perspective," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(5), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Nick O'Donovan, 2021. "One‐off wealth taxes: theory and evidence," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(3-4), pages 565-597, September.
    10. Sheila Killian & Philip O'Regan & Ruth Lynch & Martin Laheen & Dionysios Karavidas, 2022. "Regulating havens: The role of hard and soft governance of tax experts in conditions of secrecy and low regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 722-737, July.
    11. Christensen, Rasmus Corlin & Hearson, Martin, 2021. "The Rise of China and Contestation in Global Tax Governance," SocArXiv pzvy3, Center for Open Science.
    12. Thomas Rixen & Brigitte Unger, 2022. "Taxation: A Regulatory Multilevel Governance Perspective," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 621-633, July.
    13. Sarah Perret, 2021. "Why were most wealth taxes abandoned and is this time different?," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(3-4), pages 539-563, September.
    14. Christensen, Rasmus Corlin & Hearson, Martin, 2022. "The Rise of China and Contestation in Global Tax Governance," Working Papers 17075, Institute of Development Studies, International Centre for Tax and Development.
    15. Elbra Ainsley D., 2014. "Interests need not be pursued if they can be created: private governance in African gold mining," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, August.
    16. Marina M. Lebedeva & Maxim V. Kharkevich, 2018. "The Role of Business in Transforming the Political Organization of the World," Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, Center for Crisis Society Studies, vol. 11(1).
    17. Jonathan F. Cogliano & Roberto Veneziani & Naoki Yoshihara, 2021. "The Dynamics of International Exploitation," Working Papers 2021-02, University of Massachusetts Boston, Economics Department.
    18. Bernard M. Hoekman & Petros C. Mavroidis, 2015. "A Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement for Services?," RSCAS Working Papers 2015/25, European University Institute.
    19. Roberto Veneziani & Naoki Yoshihara, 2017. "Globalisation and inequality in a dynamic economy: an axiomatic analysis of unequal exchange," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 49(3), pages 445-468, December.
    20. Van Alstine, James & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "Business and development: Changing discourses in the extractive industries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 4-16.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:1:p:72-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.