IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v13y2022is2p9-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Destined to Brexit? British Pathways to Membership in the European Communities 1945–73

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfram Kaiser

Abstract

This article explores whether and how the United Kingdom was destined to Brexit before it even joined the European Communities in 1973. Drawing on archival sources, media reports and literature about Britain's arduous relationship with ‘Europe’, it argues that four features made the Brexit outcome more likely. They were the accession to the EC as a measure of last resort which prevented the construction of a new sustainable narrative about a brighter future in ‘Europe’; the political elites’ use of the issue of EC membership or further integration for short term party gains; highly exaggerated hopes that membership in and by itself would cure Britain's economic ills or give it a new global leadership role; and a colonial style diplomacy that severely underestimated Britain's growing dependency on its continental European neighbours. In conclusion, the article argues that it nevertheless required the formation of a parochial political elite of little Englanders to achieve the extreme outcome of Brexit.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfram Kaiser, 2022. "Destined to Brexit? British Pathways to Membership in the European Communities 1945–73," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(S2), pages 9-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:13:y:2022:i:s2:p:9-19
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13067
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Lord, 1992. "Sovereign or Confused? The ‘Great Debate’ about British Entry to the European Community 20 Years On," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 419-436, December.
    2. Dell, Edmund, 1995. "The Schuman Plan and the British Abdication of Leadership in Europe," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198289678.
    3. Laurent Warlouzet, 2018. "Governing Europe in a Globalizing World Neoliberalism and its alternatives following the 1973 Oil crisis," Post-Print hal-02514104, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kiran Klaus Patel, 2020. "Why the EU Became 'Europe'. Towards a New History of European Union," Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science, Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, Torino (Italy), vol. 54(1), pages 199-216, June.
    2. Bulfone, Fabio, 2020. "The political economy of industrial policy in the European Union," MPIfG Discussion Paper 20/12, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Laurent Warlouzet, 2019. "The EEC/EU as an Evolving Compromise between French Dirigism and German Ordoliberalism (1957–1995)," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 77-93, January.
    4. Nauro F Campos & Fabrizio Coricelli, 2017. "EU Membership, Mrs Thatcher’s Reforms and Britain’s Economic Decline," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 59(2), pages 169-193, June.
    5. Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel & Seçil Şenel, 2018. "Analyzing the Global Risks for the Financial Crisis after the Great Depression Using Comparative Hybrid Hesitant Fuzzy Decision-Making Models: Policy Recommendations for Sustainable Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Andrew J. Crozier, 2020. "British exceptionalism: pride and prejudice and Brexit," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 635-658, July.
    7. Rutger Claassen & Anna Gerbrandy & Sebastiaan Princen & Mathieu Segers, 2019. "Four Models of Protecting Citizenship and Social Rights in Europe: Conclusions to the Special Issue ‘Rethinking the European Social Market Economy’," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 159-174, January.
    8. Bas Bavel & Marten Scheffer, 2021. "Historical effects of shocks on inequality: the great leveler revisited," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    9. Fabio Masini, 2019. "What Went Wrong. The Failure of the 1993 Delors? White Paper," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 8(2), pages 85-100.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:13:y:2022:i:s2:p:9-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.