IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v13y2022is1p5-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dynamics of Governance and Sustainable Development Goals in the Global South

Author

Listed:
  • Hong Liu
  • Celia Lee
  • Chris Alden

Abstract

This special issue on ‘The Dynamics of Governance and Sustainable Development Goals in the Global South’, with a focus on the ‘Asian Models of Governance’, aims to fill the gap by contributing to expanding and advancing the transnational knowledge transfer literature by bringing new cases from the Global South. It also hopes to further advance the discussions translating some aspects of Asian experiences of governance in developing an outcome‐driven knowledge and policy transfer model for SDGs. The articles in this issue of Global Policy were selected from papers first presented at the London School of Economics – IDEAS and Nanyang Technological University – Nanyang Centre for Public Administration (LSE‐IDEAS and NTU‐NCPA) Joint Workshop on the Dynamics of Knowledge Transfer and Governance in the Global South, held at the London School of Economics in November 2019.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong Liu & Celia Lee & Chris Alden, 2022. "The Dynamics of Governance and Sustainable Development Goals in the Global South," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(S1), pages 5-10, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:13:y:2022:i:s1:p:5-10
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13075
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tugendhat, Henry & Alemu, Dawit, 2016. "Chinese Agricultural Training Courses for African Officials: Between Power and Partnerships," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 71-81.
    2. Simplice A. Asongu & Paul N. Acha-Anyi, 2020. "A survey on the Washington Consensus and the Beijing Model: reconciling development perspectives," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 67(2), pages 111-129, June.
    3. Wolfgang Drechsler, 2013. "Three paradigms of governance and administration: Chinese, Western and Islamic," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 35(3), pages 319-342, September.
    4. Barrientos, Armando & Amann, Ed, 2014. "Is there a Brazilian model of development? Are there lessons for countries in Africa?," WIDER Working Paper Series 134, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Scoones, Ian & Amanor, Kojo & Favareto, Arilson & Qi, Gubo, 2016. "A New Politics of Development Cooperation? Chinese and Brazilian Engagements in African Agriculture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-12.
    6. John Ross & Jinghai Zheng & Karla Simone Prime, 2016. "What can be learned from China’s success?," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 51-68, February.
    7. Denghua Zhang & Graeme Smith, 2017. "China’s foreign aid system: structure, agencies, and identities," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(10), pages 2330-2346, October.
    8. Jing Gu & Xiaoyun Li & Gerald Bloom & Xiulan Zhang, 2014. "Introduction: China and International Development: Challenges and Opportunities," IDS Bulletin, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(4), pages 1-5, July.
    9. Armando Barrientos & Ed Amann, 2014. "Is there a new Brazilian model of development? Main findings from the IRIBA research programme," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series iriba_wp13, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    10. Hong Liu & Ting‐Yan Wang, 2021. "The institutionalization and effectiveness of transnational policy transfer: The China–Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park as a case study," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(3), pages 103-114, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tugendhat, Henry & Alemu, Dawit, 2016. "Chinese Agricultural Training Courses for African Officials: Between Power and Partnerships," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 71-81.
    2. Amann, Edmund & Baer, Werner & Trebat, Thomas & Lora, Juan Villa, 2016. "Infrastructure and its role in Brazil's development process," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 66-73.
    3. Gu, Jing & Zhang, Chuanhong & Vaz, Alcides & Mukwereza, Langton, 2016. "Chinese State Capitalism? Rethinking the Role of the State and Business in Chinese Development Cooperation in Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 24-34.
    4. Gabriela Marcondes & Tom De Bruyn, 2015. "Brazil’s South-South Cooperation in food security," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 7(6), pages 1153-1164, December.
    5. Amanor, Kojo S. & Chichava, Sérgio, 2016. "South–South Cooperation, Agribusiness, and African Agricultural Development: Brazil and China in Ghana and Mozambique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 13-23.
    6. Judit Ricz, 2017. "New developmentalist experiments in Brazil and Egypt - a comparative study," IWE Working Papers 227, Institute for World Economics - Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    7. Wang, Yuan, 2022. "Presidential extraversion: Understanding the politics of Sino-African mega-infrastructure projects," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    8. Caichen Ma & Yunxiao Xu & James L. Chan, 2015. "Debate: Wang Anshi and Confucian public management--a rejoinder," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 253-254, July.
    9. Shankland, Alex & Gonçalves, Euclides, 2016. "Imagining Agricultural Development in South–South Cooperation: The Contestation and Transformation of ProSAVANA," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 35-46.
    10. Tom Goodfellow & Zhengli Huang, 2021. "Contingent infrastructure and the dilution of ‘Chineseness’: Reframing roads and rail in Kampala and Addis Ababa," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(4), pages 655-674, June.
    11. Simplice A. Asongu & John Kuada, 2020. "Building knowledge economies in Africa: an introduction," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 1-6, January.
    12. Xiaoyu Jiang & Yangfen Chen & Lijuan Wang, 2018. "Can China’s Agricultural FDI in Developing Countries Achieve a Win-Win Goal?—Enlightenment from the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    13. de Moraes Achcar, Helena, 2022. "South-South cooperation and the re-politicization of development in health," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    14. Scoones, Ian & Amanor, Kojo & Favareto, Arilson & Qi, Gubo, 2016. "A New Politics of Development Cooperation? Chinese and Brazilian Engagements in African Agriculture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-12.
    15. Gu, Jing & Renwick, Neil & Xue, Lan, 2018. "The BRICS and Africa's search for green growth, clean energy and sustainable development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 675-683.
    16. Cabral, Lídia & Favareto, Arilson & Mukwereza, Langton & Amanor, Kojo, 2016. "Brazil’s Agricultural Politics in Africa: More Food International and the Disputed Meanings of “Family Farming”," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 47-60.
    17. Peter J Buckley & L Jeremy Clegg & Hinrich Voss & Adam R Cross & Xin Liu & Ping Zheng, 2018. "A retrospective and agenda for future research on Chinese outward foreign direct investment," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(1), pages 4-23, January.
    18. Liu, Ailan & Wang, Zhixuan & Zhu, Pengcheng, 2021. "Does informal economy undermine the effects of China’s aid on its outward foreign direct investment?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 315-329.
    19. Chimhowu, Admos, 2019. "The ‘new’ African customary land tenure. Characteristic, features and policy implications of a new paradigm," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 897-903.
    20. Sara Caria, 2022. "Cooperation Regimes and Hegemonic Struggle: Opportunities and Challenges for Developing Countries," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 71-81.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:13:y:2022:i:s1:p:5-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.