IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v31y2024i2p666-682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Guilt, care, and the ideal worker: Comparing guilt among working carers and care workers

Author

Listed:
  • Camille Allard
  • Grace J. Whitfield

Abstract

This article explores care workers and working carers' experiences of work. It focuses on how both groups of workers experience pressures to adhere to an ideal, which this article argues, is centered on an emotional reaction of guilt. Through this ideal of a guilty worker, a “care ethic” is reconfigured to become a “work ethic.” Drawing on 120 semistructured interviews with care workers, working carers, trade union officers, and care company managers, the article examines how guilt is experienced and constructed in the workplace, and how it becomes beneficial to the aims of the employing organization. The article links the construction and instrumentalization of guilt to Acker's analysis of the ideal worker and to the problematic discourse of the “heroism” of key workers during the Covid‐19 pandemic. This discourse can reinforce the image of a sacrificial ideal worker; it implies that if workers do not take a sacrificial approach as part of their work and care ethics, they should feel guilty.

Suggested Citation

  • Camille Allard & Grace J. Whitfield, 2024. "Guilt, care, and the ideal worker: Comparing guilt among working carers and care workers," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 666-682, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:31:y:2024:i:2:p:666-682
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12956
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L.J.B. Hayes & Sian Moore, 2017. "Care in a Time of Austerity: the Electronic Monitoring of Homecare Workers’ Time," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 329-344, July.
    2. Stella M. Nkomo & Jenny K. Rodriguez, 2019. "Joan Acker's influence on Management and Organization Studies: Review, analysis and directions for the future," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(12), pages 1730-1748, December.
    3. Bénédicte Berthe & Camille Chédotal, 2018. "La culpabilité au travail : La parole aux salariés," Post-Print hal-01828321, HAL.
    4. Bénédicte Berthe & Camille Chédotal, 2018. "La culpabilité au travail : la parole aux salariés," Post-Print hal-01906525, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mona Zanhour & Dana McDaniel Sumpter, 2024. "The entrenchment of the ideal worker norm during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from working mothers in the United States," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 625-643, March.
    2. Dorian R. Woods & Yvonne Benschop & Marieke van den Brink, 2022. "What is intersectional equality? A definition and goal of equality for organizations," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 92-109, January.
    3. Alain Topor & David Matscheck, 2021. "Diversity, Complexity and Ordinality: Mental Health Services Outside the Institutions—Service Users’ and Professionals’ Experience-Based Practices and Knowledges, and New Public Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Anne Antoni & Juliane Reinecke & Marianna Fotaki, 2023. "Making Time to Care, and Caring for Time: ‘Tricking Time’ to Cope with Conflicting Temporalities in a Child Protection Agency," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(4), pages 645-663, December.
    5. Trudy Bates, 2022. "Rethinking how we work with Acker's theory of gendered organizations: An abductive approach for feminist empirical research," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1041-1064, July.
    6. Eline Jammaers & Astrid Huopalainen, 2023. "“I prefer working with mares, like women, difficult in character but go the extra mile”: A study of multiple inequalities in equine (sports) business," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2049-2068, November.
    7. Julie MacLeavy, 2021. "Care work, gender inequality and technological advancement in the age of COVID‐19," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 138-154, January.
    8. Lilas Al‐Asfahani & Gail Hebson & Mike Bresnen, 2024. "Reinforced or disrupted ideal worker norms in the pandemic? Analyzing the gendered impact of the pandemic on professional specialisms in a Professional Services Firm in Kuwait," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 644-665, March.
    9. Julie Rowlands & Jill Blackmore & Andrea Gallant, 2020. "Enacting leadership professional development and the impediments to organizational and industry change in rural and regional Australia," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 1269-1284, November.
    10. Malley, Juliette & D'Amico, Francesco & Fernandez, Jose-Luis, 2019. "What is the relationship between the quality of care experience and quality of life outcomes? Some evidence from long-term home care in England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    11. Ghazal Mir Zulfiqar, 2022. "Inequality Regimes, Patriarchal Connectivity, and the Elusive Right to Own Land for Women in Pakistan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(4), pages 799-811, May.
    12. Donna Baines & Annabel Dulhunty & Sara Charlesworth, 2022. "Relationship-Based Care Work, Austerity and Aged Care," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(1), pages 139-155, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:31:y:2024:i:2:p:666-682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.