IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjx/jomwor/v2023y2023i3p19-28id249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Management Theories in Startups Assessment: A Multicriteria Fuzzy Decision-making Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Akshay Kumar
  • Pallavi Dinesh
  • Satyabrat Buradi

Abstract

Evaluating start-up companies is an important management process for technology business incubators and it is also a typical multi-criteria decision‐making (MCDM) problem. Venture capitalists consider a MCDM problem before investing in a new venture, and the order preference of these criteria helps them make effective and efficient decisions. In this paper, we use fuzzy logic with the analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) technique to measure the relative importance of the strategic theory variables in assessment of a startup. The results of the study show that venture capitalist investors consider internal resources to be the most important criteria in evaluation, followed by industry resources and network-based. Entrepreneurs' track record also has a strong significant influence on startup assessment. The suggested tools confirm that it is possible to diversify the risks of an investor through the allocation of resources between several projects, in accordance with the received vector of global priorities, and such information is of high value for the process of decision-making. Therefore, the proposed approach outranks the required strategic inputs and provides a foundation to incorporate other statistical techniques, such as ANP, machine learning, and deep learning, in evaluation and to validate the results for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Akshay Kumar & Pallavi Dinesh & Satyabrat Buradi, 2023. "Strategic Management Theories in Startups Assessment: A Multicriteria Fuzzy Decision-making Approach," Journal of Management World, Academia Publishing Group, vol. 2023(3), pages 19-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjx:jomwor:v:2023:y:2023:i:3:p:19-28:id:249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://managementworld.online/index.php/mw/article/view/249/247
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to Journal of Management World
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjx:jomwor:v:2023:y:2023:i:3:p:19-28:id:249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucía Aguado (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://managementworld.online/index.php/mw/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.