IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjw/econen/v4y2014i2p67-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of balanced scorecard in Vietnamese enteprises

Author

Listed:
  • Trinh Thuy Anh

    (Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Vietnam)

Abstract

Balanced scorecard is a highly effective method for performance measurement and strategic management in organizations and enterprises. The number of companies applying this method in Vietnam currently is not very high. For this reason, this paper aims to determine key factors for success when implementing balanced scorecard in Vietnamese enterprises. Then, it assesses the possibility for applying the method in companies who are planning to apply it. The data was collected from a survey of 6 companies who have applied balanced scorecard successfully and 19 companies who want to apply it. The data analysis result from the 6 companies who have had success with the balanced scorecard shows four major success factors, including balanced scorecard usefulness, balanced scorecard design, company human resource capacity, and balanced scorecard implementation process. Then, these factors were applied into 19 companies who have interest in implement the balanced scorecard to evaluate the ability to apply balanced scorecard. The result show that senior leaders’ point of views, strategy planning and execution, performance assessment, human resource capacity, and operation management of the company could affect to balanced scorecard implementation. Therefore, business leaders need to focus on these factors in order to successfully implement balanced scorecard in Vietnamese enterprises. Qualitative analysis were applied in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Trinh Thuy Anh, 2014. "Implementation of balanced scorecard in Vietnamese enteprises," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 4(2), pages 67-74.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjw:econen:v:4:y:2014:i:2:p:67-74
    DOI: 10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.4.2.98.2014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/econ-en/article/view/98/87
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.4.2.98.2014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Papalexandris, Alexandros & Ioannou, George & Prastacos, Gregory & Eric Soderquist, Klas, 2005. "An Integrated Methodology for Putting the Balanced Scorecard into Action," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 214-227, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pan, Jeh-Nan & Nguyen, Hung Thi Ngoc, 2015. "Achieving customer satisfaction through product–service systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 179-190.
    2. Abolfazl Sherafat & Khadijeh Yavari & Sayyed Mohammad Reza Davoodi, 2014. "Evaluation of the Strategy Management Implementation in Project-Oriented Service Organizations," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 10(1), pages 16-25, February.
    3. Alemayehu Molla, 2013. "Identifying IT sustainability performance drivers: Instrument development and validation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(5), pages 705-723, November.
    4. D Wu & D L Olson, 2010. "Enterprise risk management: coping with model risk in a large bank," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(2), pages 179-190, February.
    5. Marie KUBANKOVA & Miroslav HAJEK & Alena VOTAVOVA, 2016. "Environmental and social value of agriculture innovation," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(3), pages 101-112.
    6. Alkinoos Psarras & Theodoros Anagnostopoulos & Nikos Tsotsolas & Ioannis Salmon & Lazaros Vryzidis, 2020. "Applying the Balanced Scorecard and Predictive Analytics in the Administration of a European Funding Program," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, December.
    7. van Wessel, R.M., 2008. "Realizing business benefits from company IT standardization : Case study research into the organizational value of IT standards, towards a company IT standardization management framework," Other publications TiSEM 4bdde091-4f3f-4be1-84aa-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Daniel, Elizabeth & Myers, Andrew & Dixon, Keith, 2012. "Adoption rationales of new management practices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 371-380.
    9. Geoffrey Bartlett & Eric Johnson & Philip Reckers, 2014. "Accountability and Role Effects in Balanced Scorecard Performance Evaluations When Strategy Timeline Is Specified," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 143-165, May.
    10. Liu, Wenbin B. & Meng, Wei & Mingers, John & Tang, Ning & Wang, Wei, 2012. "Developing a performance management system using soft systems methodology: A Chinese case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 529-540.
    11. Thomas J. Lampoltshammer & Heidrun Maurer & Nike Pulda & Peter Klimek & Jan Hurt & Ursula Rosenbichler, 2023. "Challenges toward Evidence-Based Policymaking Using Agent-Based Modeling for Federal Sports Grants: A Self-Reflection from a Transdisciplinary Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-34, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjw:econen:v:4:y:2014:i:2:p:67-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vu Tuan Truong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/econ-en .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.