IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjw/econen/v10y2020i1p120-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of brand positioning and knowledge on attitude towards brand and purchase intention: A study of organic rice in Ho Chi Minh City

Author

Listed:
  • Hoang Thi Phuong Thao

    (Postgraduate school, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Vietnam, Vietnam)

  • Lu Van Bao Long

    (Postgraduate school, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Vietnam, Vietnam)

  • Nguyen Le Thai Hoa

    (Business Administration School, Saigon Technology University (STU), Vietnam, Vietnam)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to measure the effectiveness of factors of brand, including Brand Positioning, Brand Knowledge, Attitude towards Organic Rice Brand, and Organic Rice Purchase Intention. The survey was conducted with a sample of 224 consumers shopping at four organic rice shops in Ho Chi Minh City. The research was performed by quantitative research methods: Cronbach's Alpha Reliability Analysis, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirm Factor Analysis (CFA), and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The research results were conducted in two direct models and the indirect models in which the indirect model was supported. This means that brand positioning and brand knowledge had no direct impact on the Intention to buy organic rice, but only an indirect one through the consumer attitude towards the organic rice brand.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoang Thi Phuong Thao & Lu Van Bao Long & Nguyen Le Thai Hoa, 2020. "The impact of brand positioning and knowledge on attitude towards brand and purchase intention: A study of organic rice in Ho Chi Minh City," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 10(1), pages 120-132.
    • Handle: RePEc:bjw:econen:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:120-132
    DOI: 10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.10.1.225.2020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/econ-en/article/view/225/175
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.10.1.225.2020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Becker-Olsen, Karen L. & Cudmore, B. Andrew & Hill, Ronald Paul, 2006. "The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 46-53, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seung Pil Lee, 2022. "The Sports-Based Holistic Development Model: The General Public’s Transformation by Having a Meaningful Story Through Sport," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    2. Alexandra ZBUCHEA & Florina PÎNZARU, 2017. "Tailoring CSR Strategy to Company Size?," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(3), pages 415-437, September.
    3. Caner Dincer & Banu Dincer, 2015. "Are Employees Concerned About Corporate Social Responsibility?," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(7), pages 17-28, July.
    4. Anne-Kathrin Ulke & Laura Marie Schons, 2016. "CSR as a Selling of Indulgences: An Experimental Investigation of Customers’ Perceptions of CSR Activities Depending on Corporate Reputation," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 263-280, October.
    5. Li, You & Wu, Shuilong & Yuan, Yongna & Hu, Zekun, 2024. "How temporal perspective affects the effectiveness of upcycled vs. recycled product advertisements," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Chris Hydock & Neeru Paharia & T. J. Weber, 2019. "The Consumer Response to Corporate Political Advocacy: a Review and Future Directions," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 6(3), pages 76-83, December.
    7. Lucia Reisch & Clive L Spash & Sabine Bietz, 2008. "Sustainable Consumption and Mass Communication: A German Experiment," Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED) Working Paper Series 2008-12, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems.
    8. Cornelis, Erlinde & Peter, Paula C., 2017. "The real campaign: The role of authenticity in the effectiveness of advertising disclaimers in digitally enhanced images," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 102-112.
    9. Skarmeas, Dionysis & Leonidou, Constantinos N., 2013. "When consumers doubt, Watch out! The role of CSR skepticism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1831-1838.
    10. Jordy F. Gosselt & Thomas Rompay & Laura Haske, 2019. "Won’t Get Fooled Again: The Effects of Internal and External CSR ECO-Labeling," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 413-424, March.
    11. Walsh, Gianfranco & Bartikowski, Boris, 2013. "Exploring corporate ability and social responsibility associations as antecedents of customer satisfaction cross-culturally," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 989-995.
    12. Habitzreuter, Anna Mei & Koenigstorfer, Joerg, 2021. "The impact of environmental CSR-linked sport sponsorship on attitude toward the sponsor depending on regulatory fit," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 720-730.
    13. Alice Mazzucchelli & Roberto Chierici & Manlio Del Giudice & Ilenia Bua, 2022. "Do circular economy practices affect corporate performance? Evidence from Italian large‐sized manufacturing firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 2016-2029, November.
    14. Fafaliou, Irene & Giaka, Maria & Konstantios, Dimitrios & Polemis, Michael, 2022. "Firms’ ESG reputational risk and market longevity: A firm-level analysis for the United States," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 161-177.
    15. Belen Fernandez‐Feijoo & Silvia Romero & Silvia Ruiz, 2018. "Financial Auditor and Sustainability Reporting: Does it matter?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 209-224, May.
    16. Xiaodong Zhu & Rongrong Gu & Bingbing Wu & Shunsuke Managi, 2017. "Does Hazy Weather Influence Earnings Management of Heavy-Polluting Enterprises? A Chinese Empirical Study from the Perspective of Negative Social Concerns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Mohammad Nurunnabi & Yazeed Alfakhri & Demah H. Alfakhri, 2018. "Consumer perceptions and corporate social responsibility: what we know so far," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(2), pages 161-187, June.
    18. Zhou, Yu & Yan, Shuangqi & Li, Gendao & Xiong, Yu & Lin, Zhibin, 2023. "The impact of consumer skepticism on blockchain-enabled sustainability disclosure in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    19. Rana Essam Shazly & Abeer A. Mahrous, 2020. "Capture the hearts to win the minds: cause-related marketing in Egypt," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 17(3), pages 255-276, September.
    20. Andrea Pérez & Ignacio Rodríguez del Bosque, 2015. "How Customer Support for Corporate Social Responsibility Influences the Image of Companies: Evidence from the Banking Industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 155-168, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjw:econen:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:120-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vu Tuan Truong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/econ-en .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.