IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/atk/issues/q3202110159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelli di trasferimento tecnologico per lo sviluppo locale: un’analisi comparativa

Author

Listed:
  • Mariacarmela Passarelli
  • Giuseppe Bongiorno
  • Valentina Cucino
  • Nikita Trofimov
  • Alfio Cariola

Abstract

The present paper offers a focus on the models of technology transfer as strategic tools for local development. It proposes a comparative analysis between the Italian and Belarus models. The aim is to show the differences in terms of roles and activities carried out by the main actors involved in the innovation process. A discussion on the opportunities to increase innovation performance, is proposed, along with possible patterns of regional development.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariacarmela Passarelli & Giuseppe Bongiorno & Valentina Cucino & Nikita Trofimov & Alfio Cariola, 2021. "Modelli di trasferimento tecnologico per lo sviluppo locale: un’analisi comparativa," Regional Economy, , vol. 5(Q3), pages 22-35.
    • Handle: RePEc:atk:issues:q32021:10159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.regionaleconomy.eu/RePEc/pdf/5Q3/q5_3_2021_22-35.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.regionaleconomy.eu/rivista/re/modelli-di-trasferimento-tecnologico-per-lo-sviluppo-locale-unanalisi-comparativa/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elias G. Carayannis & David F.J. Campbell, 2012. "Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems," SpringerBriefs in Business, Springer, number 978-1-4614-2062-0, October.
    2. Apanasovich, Natalja & Alcalde Heras, Henar & Parrilli, Mario Davide, 2016. "The impact of business innovation modes on SME innovation performance in post-Soviet transition economies: The case of Belarus," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 57, pages 30-40.
    3. Bradley, Samantha R. & Hayter, Christopher S. & Link, Albert N., 2013. "Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer," UNCG Economics Working Papers 13-10, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Department of Economics.
    4. Elias G. Carayannis & David F. J. Campbell, 2012. "Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems," SpringerBriefs in Business, in: Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems, pages 1-63, Springer.
    5. Belitski, Maksim & Aginskaja, Anna & Marozau, Radzivon, 2019. "Commercializing university research in transition economies: Technology transfer offices or direct industrial funding?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 601-615.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tommaso Minola & Davide Hahn & Lucio Cassia, 2021. "The relationship between origin and performance of innovative start-ups: the role of technological knowledge at founding," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 553-569, February.
    2. Carayannis, Elias G. & Goletsis, Yorgos & Grigoroudis, Evangelos, 2018. "Composite innovation metrics: MCDA and the Quadruple Innovation Helix framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 4-17.
    3. Natalya Radko & Maksim Belitski & Yelena Kalyuzhnova, 2023. "Conceptualising the entrepreneurial university: the stakeholder approach," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 955-1044, June.
    4. De Silva, Muthu & Gokhberg, Leonid & Meissner, Dirk & Russo, Margherita, 2021. "Addressing societal challenges through the simultaneous generation of social and business values: A conceptual framework for science-based co-creation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    5. Ávila-Robinson, Alfonso & Islam, Nazrul & Sengoku, Shintaro, 2022. "Exploring the knowledge base of innovation research: Towards an emerging innovation model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    6. Mikko Koria & Roberto Osorno-Hinojosa & Delia del Carmen Ramírez-Vázquez & Antonius van den Broek, 2022. "One World, Two Ideas and Three Adaptations: Innovation Intermediaries Enabling Sustainable Open Innovation in University–Industry Collaboration in Finland, Mexico and Nicaragua," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Conor O’Kane & James A. Cunningham & Matthias Menter & Sara Walton, 2021. "The brokering role of technology transfer offices within entrepreneurial ecosystems: an investigation of macro–meso–micro factors," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1814-1844, December.
    8. Soares, Thiago J. & Torkomian, Ana L.V., 2021. "TTO's staff and technology transfer: Examining the effect of employees' individual capabilities," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    9. Yee Yee Sein & Viktor Prokop, 2021. "Mediating Role of Firm R&D in Creating Product and Process Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Norway," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Petra Maresova & Ruzena Stemberkova & Oluwaseun Fadeyi, 2019. "Models, Processes, and Roles of Universities in Technology Transfer Management: A Systematic Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-36, September.
    11. Mauricio Camargo & Laure Morel & Pascal Lhoste, 2021. "Progressive University Technology Transfer of Innovation Capabilities to SMEs: An Active and Modular Educational Partnership," Post-Print hal-03140931, HAL.
    12. Civera, Alice & Meoli, Michele & Vismara, Silvio, 2020. "Engagement of academics in university technology transfer: Opportunity and necessity academic entrepreneurship," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    13. Solis-Navarrete, José Alberto & Bucio-Mendoza, Saray & Paneque-Gálvez, Jaime, 2021. "What is not social innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    14. Battaglia, Daniele & Landoni, Paolo & Rizzitelli, Francesco, 2017. "Organizational structures for external growth of University Technology Transfer Offices: An explorative analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 45-56.
    15. Catalina Martínez & Valerio Sterzi, 2021. "The impact of the abolishment of the professor’s privilege on European university-owned patents," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 247-282, March.
    16. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Doherr, Thorsten & Hussinger, Katrin & Schliessler, Paula & Toole, Andrew A., 2016. "Knowledge Creates Markets: The influence of entrepreneurial support and patent rights on academic entrepreneurship," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 131-146.
    17. Nanditha Mathew & George Paily, 2022. "STI-DUI innovation modes and firm performance in the Indian capital goods industry: Do small firms differ from large ones?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 435-458, April.
    18. Annita Nugent & Ho Fai Chan & Uwe Dulleck, 2022. "Government funding of university-industry collaboration: exploring the impact of targeted funding on university patent activity," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(1), pages 29-73, January.
    19. Véronique Schaeffer & Sıla Öcalan-Özel & Julien Pénin, 2020. "The complementarities between formal and informal channels of university–industry knowledge transfer: a longitudinal approach," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 31-55, February.
    20. James A. Cunningham & Paul O’Reilly, 2018. "Macro, meso and micro perspectives of technology transfer," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 545-557, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    technology transfer model; Research & Development; innovation process;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • P5 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:atk:issues:q32021:10159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Regional Economy (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.