IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ase/jgpgta/v9y2020i2p17-27id345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of the Return on Foreign Investments of the United States, Germany and Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Sergey Yakubovskiy
  • Giorgio Dominese
  • Tetiana Rodionova
  • Arina Tsviakh

Abstract

This research paper aims to analyze the return on foreign outward and inward investments of the United States, Germany and Japan. For all of the three countries the cumulative inflows of the financial account from inward direct, portfolio and other investments significantly exceed the income outflow. At the same time, the amount of income received by the United States exceeds the amount of investment abroad. Due to the fact that the profitability of outward investments for the US, Japan and Germany exceeds the return on inward investments it can be concluded that participation of these countries in international investments has a positive effect on their balance of payments. In the countries that are partners of the United States, Japan and Germany the opposite effect is observed. The results of the study indicate that in 2020 due to the financial stimulation of the social-economic development in the conditions of the coronavirus pandemic the sharp increase of the level of public debt to GDP in the US, Japan and Germany has not yet affected significantly the yield of government securities. However, if the current expansionary fiscal policies of the United States and Japan are continued, countries may face substantial problems in servicing their public debt. In such a situation the Central Bank of Japan and the US Federal Reserve System will be forced to keep the discount rate at almost zero for a long time, fearing a sharp rise in the cost of servicing public debt.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergey Yakubovskiy & Giorgio Dominese & Tetiana Rodionova & Arina Tsviakh, 2020. "Comparative Analysis of the Return on Foreign Investments of the United States, Germany and Japan," Journal Global Policy and Governance, Transition Academia Press, vol. 9(2), pages 17-27.
  • Handle: RePEc:ase:jgpgta:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:17-27:id:345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jgpg/article/view/345/225
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to Journal Global Policy and Governance
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ase:jgpgta:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:17-27:id:345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giorgio Dominese (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jgpg/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.