IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ase/jgpgta/v11y2022i2p101-118id572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Microcredit Governance Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Emiljan Karma
  • Klodian Muço
  • Mauro Gianfranco Bisceglia

Abstract

Albanian microfinance sector, in particular microcredit, has experienced modest development in recent years, although having the objective (moreover shared at the EU level) of the fight against social and financial exclusion, self-employment promotion, and small businesses support. Microcredit represents a lifeline or starting point for small entrepreneurs or start-ups to access credit, which is impossible otherwise. Thus, it provides a start-up or survival opportunity for people and businesses that would not have vital space in different circumstances. An instrument widely used in Western Countries, therefore, to be replicated mainly in developing countries such as Albania to allow more favorable conditions for credit access and consequently more economic and social growth. This paper aims to provide an assessment of the financial and social efficiency of the microfinance sector and, in particular, of Albanian microcredit. This evaluation is carried out using DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) method through secondary data obtained from financial institutions operating in Albania. The analysis highlights the noticeable financial and social inefficiencies. This study clearly points out the greater attention of microcredit institutions toward financial objectives (and less to social ones).

Suggested Citation

  • Emiljan Karma & Klodian Muço & Mauro Gianfranco Bisceglia, 2022. "Microcredit Governance Efficiency," Journal Global Policy and Governance, Transition Academia Press, vol. 11(2), pages 101-118.
  • Handle: RePEc:ase:jgpgta:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:101-118:id:572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jgpg/article/view/572/293
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to Journal Global Policy and Governance
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ase:jgpgta:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:101-118:id:572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giorgio Dominese (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jgpg/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.