IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ase/jgpgta/v10y2021i1p99-120id364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Current Fishing Dispute in the South China Sea: A Vietnamese Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Xuan Cuong Nguyen

Abstract

The South China Sea is one of the world’s security hotspots regarding territorial sovereignty disputes between China, Taiwan and some South-east Asian countries such as Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei. Currently, the dispute situation in the South China Sea is increasingly complicated and tends to be more stressful because the region’s situation is not only heated up by territorial sovereignty disputes, geostrategic competition among great powers, but also heated up by various non-traditional security issues, including fisheries security issues such as overfishing, illegal fishing activities, conflicts over fisheries activities between countries. However, at present, there are no effective cooperative and rational mechanisms for fisheries in the South China Sea. Meanwhile, ASEAN is an important mechanism for managing regional security issues, including non-traditional security in the South China Sea. However, ASEAN’s role in this region is still relatively weak. Given that situation, the article analyses the current situation of fisheries security issue in the South China Sea and clarifies how ASEAN’s role in this sector plays out in the current period. What actions should ASEAN take to contribute to ensuring non-traditional security in the South China Sea in general and fisheries security in particular?

Suggested Citation

  • Xuan Cuong Nguyen, 2021. "Current Fishing Dispute in the South China Sea: A Vietnamese Perspective," Journal Global Policy and Governance, Transition Academia Press, vol. 10(1), pages 99-120.
  • Handle: RePEc:ase:jgpgta:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:99-120:id:364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jgpg/article/view/364/248
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to Journal Global Policy and Governance
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ase:jgpgta:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:99-120:id:364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giorgio Dominese (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://transitionacademiapress.org/jgpg/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.