IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2020p483-493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Permutation of UTME Multiple-Choice Test Items on Performance in Use of English and Mathematics Among Prospective Higher Education Students

Author

Listed:
  • Bassey A. Bassey

    (Department of Educational Foundations, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria)

  • Isaac O. Ubi

    (Department of Educational Foundations, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria)

  • German E. Anagbougu

    (Department of Educational Foundations, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria)

  • Valentine J. Owan*

    (Department of Educational Management, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria)

Abstract

In an attempt to curtail examination malpractice, the Joint Admission and Matriculation Board (JAMB) has been generating different paper types with a different order of test items in the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME). However, the permutation of test items may compromise students’ performance unintentionally because constructive suggestions in theory and practice recommend that test items be sequenced in ascending order of difficulty. This study used data collected from a random sample of 1,226 SSIII students to ascertain whether the permutation of test items has any effect on the performance of students in two different subjects (Use of English and Mathematics). The study adopted the Equivalent Groups Quasi-Experimental Research Design with three independent groups. Findings emerged, amongst others, that there is a significant difference in the performance scores of prospective university students’ in use of English and Mathematics examintaions arranged in three different orders (ED, DE, R). There are no significant gender differences in the performance of students in Use of English and Mathematics based on test item permutation. However female students perform better than male students when test items are arranged in ascending order of difficulty while males perform better when test items are arranged in descending order of difficulty. It was concluded that the permutation of test items in UTME examination tends to affect the performance of students in Use of English and Mathematics. This finding has implications for the future conduct of UTME examinations and enrolment into higher education as the randomization of UTME test items changes the difficulty order of different paper types. It was recommended that other measures of curtailing examination malpractices that would not affect students’ academic performance should be adopted.

Suggested Citation

  • Bassey A. Bassey & Isaac O. Ubi & German E. Anagbougu & Valentine J. Owan*, 2020. "Permutation of UTME Multiple-Choice Test Items on Performance in Use of English and Mathematics Among Prospective Higher Education Students," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 6(4), pages 483-493, 04-2020.
  • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2020:p:483-493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/jssr6(4)483-493.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/archive/04-2020/4/6
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2020:p:483-493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.