IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajp/edwast/v4y2020i1p37-40id277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Food and Drink: Thoughts on Base Size in Sensory and Consumer Research

Author

Listed:
  • Howard Moskowitz

Abstract

In the applied world of product testing the appropriate number of panelists (base size) involves technical and business considerations. Base sizes range from very low (around six; used in expert panelist profiling) to high (hundreds; used in product tests by marketing researchers). Often base sizes are dictated by the requirement that the project identify statistical differences between or among samples. The probabilistic analysis of differences (significance vs. insignificance) derives from statistical theory, with base size used as a method to influence the sampling error (variability). This paper looks at base sizes another way-from the viewpoint of psychophysical scaling. The issue then can be re-stated as ‘what is the necessary base size at which the average rating stabilizes?’ Empirical data suggest that base sizes of 40-50 panelists generate stable averages and that beyond the 80 panelists the average is not particularly affected by the base size. These results hold for actual data for a variety of products, and for different types of attributes, specifically sensory (amount of a characteristic), and hedonic (liking of a characteristic).

Suggested Citation

  • Howard Moskowitz, 2020. "Food and Drink: Thoughts on Base Size in Sensory and Consumer Research," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 4(1), pages 37-40.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:4:y:2020:i:1:p:37-40:id:277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/277/158
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Food; Psychology; Psychophysics.;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajp:edwast:v:4:y:2020:i:1:p:37-40:id:277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Melissa Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.