IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aiy/jnljtr/v9y2023i2p197-216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tax-Cut Policies, Accounting Conservatism, and Corporate Tax Burden Stickiness: Empirical Analysis from China

Author

Listed:
  • Feilei Li
  • Luhua Xie
  • Yexiang Ruan

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between tax-cut policy, accounting conservatism, and corporate tax burden stickiness in Chinese listed companies from 2008 to 2019. The primary objective is to identify the underlying reasons for continued high levels of corporate tax burdens despite the introduction of tax-cut policies. An econometric model was developed to analyze the transmission mechanism of these policies affecting corporate tax burden stickiness to achieve this goal. The tax burden stickiness refers to the mismatch between the objective and subjective tax burdens. Results reveal four primary findings: Firstly, macro tax-cut policies induced micro-enterprises to soften their accounting conservatism, leading to increased corporate tax burden stickiness. Secondly, the reduced quality of corporate accounting reports, influenced by tax-cut policies, contributes to corporate income tax burden stickiness. In contrast, the VAT tax burden remains unaffected. Thirdly, compared to state-owned enterprises, private enterprises responded more sensitively to tax reduction policies by significantly decreasing their accounting conservatism level and increasing corporate tax burden stickiness. Finally, high-tech manufacturing enterprises recorded the highest increase in corporate tax burden stickiness, suggesting that different robust accounting policies exist across various industries and may be critical factors determining corporate tax burden stickiness. In practical terms, this study provides important insights into improving businesses’ understanding of tax burden patterns, enabling improved resource allocation of taxes accordingly. Additionally, it focuses on enhancing accounting conservatism to alleviate the pain of high tax burdens on such businesses. Ultimately, minimizing the stickiness of tax burdens will allow fiscal and taxation policies to better flex their regulatory muscles toward achieving effective and stable economic growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Feilei Li & Luhua Xie & Yexiang Ruan, 2023. "Tax-Cut Policies, Accounting Conservatism, and Corporate Tax Burden Stickiness: Empirical Analysis from China," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 9(2), pages 197-216.
  • Handle: RePEc:aiy:jnljtr:v:9:y:2023:i:2:p:197-216
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2023.9.2.137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalaer.ru//fileadmin/user_upload/site_15907/2023/Li_et_al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2023.9.2.137?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:jnljtr:v:9:y:2023:i:2:p:197-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalia Starodubets (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.