IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/paaero/340101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motives and Barriers to Innovations Implementation in Cattle Farms

Author

Listed:
  • Kusz, Dariusz

Abstract

The implementation of innovations into agricultural practice depends on many factors. These include, among others, farmers’ individual predispositions, especially the internal processes occurring in the human psyche, including predispositions, creative activity, willingness to take risks and motivations. The aim of the research is to determine the motives and barriers to introduce innovations in farms engaged in cattle breeding. The study was conducted from November 2022 to February 2023. Purposeful selection of the sample was used, and the farms engaged in cattle production, both milk and meat production, were selected for the study. The research was carried out in the Podkarpackie Voivodeship. The auditorium survey method was used in the research. The sample of 329 respondents was analysed. The research found that the youngest, best-educated farmers and those running large farms were more motivated to introduce innovations than others. Farmers’ motives to implement innovative solutions were mainly related to the desire to improve management efficiency, the quality of production, the conditions in which production takes place, and reduce the negative impact on the natural environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Kusz, Dariusz, 2023. "Motives and Barriers to Innovations Implementation in Cattle Farms," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2023(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:340101
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.340101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/340101/files/KUSZ-19.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.340101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher B. Barrett & Michael R. Carter & C. Peter Timmer, 2010. "A Century-Long Perspective on Agricultural Development," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 92(2), pages 447-468.
    2. Minna Saunila, 2016. "Performance measurement approach for innovation capability in SMEs," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 65(2), pages 162-176, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kusz, Dariusz, 2023. "Motives and Barriers to Innovations and Implementation in Cattle Farms," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2023(4).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kusz, Dariusz, 2023. "Motives and Barriers to Innovations Implementation in Cattle Farms," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2015(6).
    2. Adom, Philip Kofi & Adams, Samuel, 2020. "Decomposition of technical efficiency in agricultural production in Africa into transient and persistent technical efficiency under heterogeneous technologies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    3. Gunasekera, Don & Cai, Yiyong & Newth, David, 2013. "Potential effects of foreign direct investment in African agriculture," Conference papers 332311, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    4. Ju Han Yeon & Seung-hwan Jang, 2023. "The Relation between Bio-Industry Performance and Innovation Capacity—Focusing on the Korean Bio-Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Patrice Rélouendé Zidouemba & Françoise Gerard, 2018. "Does Agricultural Productivity Actually Matter for Food Security in a Landlocked Sub†Saharan African Country? The Case of Burkina Faso," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 66(1), pages 103-142, March.
    6. Meilin Ma & Jessie Lin & Richard J. Sexton, 2022. "The Transition from Small to Large Farms in Developing Economies: A Welfare Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(1), pages 111-133, January.
    7. Ram Fishman & Stephen C. Smith & Vida Bobic & Munshi Sulaiman, 2022. "Can Agricultural Extension and Input Support Be Discontinued? Evidence from a Randomized Phaseout in Uganda," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 104(6), pages 1273-1288, November.
    8. Kusz, Dariusz, 2023. "Motives and Barriers to Innovations and Implementation in Cattle Farms," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2023(4).
    9. Komarek, Adam M. & De Pinto, Alessandro & Smith, Vincent H., 2020. "A review of types of risks in agriculture: What we know and what we need to know," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    10. Sanfo, Safiétou & Gérard, Françoise, 2012. "Public policies for rural poverty alleviation: The case of agricultural households in the Plateau Central area of Burkina Faso," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-9.
    11. Stephen C. Smith & Ram Fishman & Vida BobicÌ & Munshi Sulaiman, 2017. "How Sustainable Are Benefits from Extension for Smallholder Farmers? Evidence from a Randomised Phase-Out of the BRAC Program in Uganda," Working Papers 2017-1, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    12. Mejía, Gonzalo & García-Díaz, César, 2018. "Market-level effects of firm-level adaptation and intermediation in networked markets of fresh foods: A case study in Colombia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 132-142.
    13. Kebebe, E., 2019. "Bridging technology adoption gaps in livestock sector in Ethiopia: A innovation system perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 30-37.
    14. Jin Yang & Hui Wang & Songqing Jin & Kevin Chen & Jeffrey Riedinger & Chao Peng, 2016. "Migration, local off-farm employment, and agricultural production efficiency: evidence from China," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 247-259, June.
    15. Flachsbarth, Insa & Grassnick, Nina & Masood, Amjad & Bruemmer, Bernhard, 2018. "The Uneven Spread of Private Food Quality Standards over Time and Space," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274197, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Yeboah, F. Kwame & Jayne, T.S., 2016. "Africa’s Evolving Employment Structure," Food Security International Development Working Papers 246956, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    17. Murat Üngör, 2016. "Did the rising importance of services decelerate overall productivity improvement of Turkey during 2002–2007?," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 238-261, July.
    18. Islam, Asadul & Ushchev, Philip & Zenou, Yves & Zhang, Xin, 2019. "The Value of Information in Technology Adoption," IZA Discussion Papers 12672, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Ebata, Ayako & Hernandez, Manuel A., 2017. "Linking smallholder farmers to markets on extensive and intensive margins: Evidence from Nicaragua☆," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 34-44.
    20. Varshney, Deepak & Joshi, P.K. & Roy, Devesh & Kumar, Anjani, 2021. "Understanding the Adoption of Modern Cultivars in India: Adoption probability and use intensity," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 47(1), January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:340101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seriaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.