IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajosrd/342170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agriculture Development Programs for Poverty Reduction Evidences from Indonesia and China -- Comparative Study Case

Author

Listed:
  • Rusliyadi, Muhamad
  • Libin, Wang

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview description of important differences in agriculture development China and Indonesia in poverty reduction efforts in rural areas and some strategy. Obviously with the view of some of the existing literature by presenting data and facts or opinions with the collaboration of several institutions associated with the topic. This paper will provide an objective picture of the development from agricultural sector level of evidence both Indonesia and China. China and Indonesia is agriculture based country with a program of integrated rural development as a whole to be a target of poverty reduction programs. Several agriculture programs related to poverty reduction has been launched and have a good impact or significance, especially in China that is able to reduce extreme poverty from 30% in 1978 to less than 3% in 2008. Certainly many lessons can be obtained from this success, especially the concept and strategy development in rural China to be a reference of other States in its development model, especially for poverty alleviation programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Rusliyadi, Muhamad & Libin, Wang, 2018. "Agriculture Development Programs for Poverty Reduction Evidences from Indonesia and China -- Comparative Study Case," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 8(02), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajosrd:342170
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.342170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/342170/files/Agriculture%20Development.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.342170?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajosrd:342170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesstea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.