IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aft/journl/v832010sepdecp67-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpretations Of Brazil: A Analysis Comparison Between Ideas Of Fernando Henrique Cardoso And Caio Prado Jãšnior

Author

Listed:
  • Diogo Del Fiori

    (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS))

Abstract

This article proposes a comparison between the vision of Fernando Henrique Cardoso and Caio Prado Júnior, identifying points of convergence between the ideas of both authors when compared with the interpretation of the PCB, which asserts the existence of feudal remnants in Brazil and consequently a revolution democratic‑bourgeois content of anti‑feudal and anti‑imperialist with a focus on defense of national independence. For Caio Prado Júnior, there was never feudalism and Brazil has always been subject to imperialism and Fernando Henrique Cardoso argues the dependence of the national bourgeoisie against the international bourgeoisie. The point of divergence between both authors is the period in which Brazil is subordinate, and for Caio Prado Júnior has since colonization, imperialism with its rule making and later times as the era of Empire and Republic, and for Fernando Henrique Cardoso from the 1960s with the installation of multinationals.

Suggested Citation

  • Diogo Del Fiori, 2010. "Interpretations Of Brazil: A Analysis Comparison Between Ideas Of Fernando Henrique Cardoso And Caio Prado Jãšnior," Revista de Economia Mackenzie (REM), Mackenzie Presbyterian University, Social and Applied Sciences Center, vol. 8(3), pages 67-80, september.
    • Handle: RePEc:aft:journl:v:8:3:2010:sep:dec:p:67-80
    DOI: -
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://editorarevistas.mackenzie.br/index.php/rem/article/view/2909/3023
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/-?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aft:journl:v:8:3:2010:sep:dec:p:67-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Instituto Presbiteriano Mackenzie (IPM) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcmacbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.