IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/afj/journ2/v17y2020i4p10-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Pension Funds Foster Economic Growth better than Mutual Funds?

Author

Listed:
  • Leonard Mushunje

    (Midlands State University)

Abstract

Tensional arguments about pension funds and mutual funds towards economic development and stimulation seem to be inevitable among policymakers and economic agents with little paid attention as in literature. This study however took a comparative significance analysis of these two independent funds in relation to economic growth in the South African economy. We hypothesize that, mutual funds are more powerful than pension funds in fostering economic growth as evidenced by some scenarios where mutual funds are trusted to encounter pension funds risks. We then used multiple linear regression model accompanied by a t-test means difference test as a measure of significance difference between the two towards economic growth. As a primer approach, we used the Pearson correlation analysis and the results were noted. Pension funds are a powerful tool of fighting poverty in economies. However, our results were not in support. Our results tend to agree with our suspicion. From all the methods used, mutual funds proved to have greater impact on stimulating economic growth (GDP) in South Africa. Therefore, South African policymakers and officials should by all ways try to support the mutual fund industry as it has traceable marks on economic growth stimulation but pension funds should not be totally ignored as they play significant roles as well such as poverty fighting and ensuring survivability of the most stressing dependent group in the economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonard Mushunje, 2020. "Do Pension Funds Foster Economic Growth better than Mutual Funds?," Africagrowth Agenda, Africagrowth Institute, vol. 17(4), pages 10-14.
  • Handle: RePEc:afj:journ2:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:10-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.co.za/doi/10.10520/ejc-afgrow-v17-n4-a2
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afj:journ2:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:10-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk De Doncker (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afrgrza.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.