IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v24y2022i59p128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vegetables Consumers’ Profile in the Context of Digitalization: Evidence from Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Lucian Tanasa

    (Romanian Academy, “Gh. Zane” Institute for Economic and Social Research, Iasi, Romania)

  • Simona-Roxana Ulman

    (“Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iasi, ICI, CERNESIM, Iasi, Romania)

  • Cristina Cautisanu

    (“Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iasi, ICI, CERNESIM, Iasi, Romania)

  • Ioan Sebastian Bruma

    (Romanian Academy, “Gh. Zane” Institute for Economic and Social Research, Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

The objectives of the European Green Deal are closely related to digitalization as a key factor in achieving them. Accordingly, this study aims at analysing the differences among the profiles of consumers from Romania regarding the method of payment used in online purchasing of fresh vegetables from local producers. Using Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Logistic Regression, main results showed similarity in consumers' profiles using debit card and bank transfer, where individuals with ages between 19-49, with an income in the household equal to at least 6,000 RON (1,213 EUR), having at least a Master’s Degree and a high frequency of buying products online, are mostly included while, in the case of cash payment, the following characteristics were observed: age between 50-64, income between 3,000-4,499 RON (606-909 EUR), mainly Bachelor’s Degree, and a low frequency of buying products online. Our results revealed that local vegetable producers should be prepared to adapt themselves to digitalization. People seem to be open to it and, for responding to such digital needs, the farmers must get out their comfort zone and become aware that this adaptation becomes a mandatory requirement on the actual market.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucian Tanasa & Simona-Roxana Ulman & Cristina Cautisanu & Ioan Sebastian Bruma, 2022. "Vegetables Consumers’ Profile in the Context of Digitalization: Evidence from Romania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(59), pages 128-128.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:24:y:2022:i:59:p:128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3068.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maro Vlachopoulou & Christos Ziakis & Kostas Vergidis & Michael Madas, 2021. "Analyzing AgriFood-Tech e-Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Annarelli, Alessandro & Battistella, Cinzia & Nonino, Fabio & Parida, Vinit & Pessot, Elena, 2021. "Literature review on digitalization capabilities: Co-citation analysis of antecedents, conceptualization and consequences," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    3. Ioan Sebastian Brumă & Codrin Dinu Vasiliu & Steliana Rodino & Marian Butu & Lucian Tanasă & Sebastian Doboș & Alina Butu & Oana Coca & Gavril Stefan, 2021. "The Behavior of Dairy Consumers in Short Food Supply Chains during COVID-19 Pandemic in Suceava Area, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Kitchen, Philip J. & Brignell, Joanne & Li, Tao & Jones, Graham Spickett, 2004. "The Emergence of IMC: A Theoretical Perspective," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(1), pages 19-30, March.
    5. Gianluca Brunori & Francesca Galli & Dominique Barjolle & Rudolf Van Broekhuizen & Luca Colombo & Mario Giampietro & James Kirwan & Tim Lang & Erik Mathijs & Damian Maye & Kees De Roest & Carin Rougoo, 2016. "Are Local Food Chains More Sustainable than Global Food Chains? Considerations for Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-27, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elżbieta Goryńska-Goldmann & Anna Murawska & Grażyna Balcerowska-Czerniak, 2023. "Consumer Profiles of Sustainable Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Ioan-Sebastian Brumă & Cristina Cautisanu & Lucian Tanasă & Simona-Roxana Ulman & Meda Gâlea & Alexandra Raluca Jelea, 2024. "Does the payment method matter in online shopping behaviour? Study on the Romanian market of vegetables during the pandemic crisis," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(1), pages 34-47.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ioan Sebastian Brumă & Simona-Roxana Ulman & Cristina Cautisanu & Lucian Tanasă & Gabriel Vasile Hoha, 2021. "Sustainability in the Case of Small Vegetable Farmers: A Matrix Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-32, September.
    2. Vladimir Todorovic & Marinko Maslaric & Sanja Bojic & Maja Jokic & Dejan Mircetic & Svetlana Nikolicic, 2018. "Solutions for More Sustainable Distribution in the Short Food Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Huynh, Minh-Tay & Nippa, Michael & Aichner, Thomas, 2023. "Big data analytics capabilities: Patchwork or progress? A systematic review of the status quo and implications for future research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    4. Chenglei Xu & Shuxin Zhu & Boru Yang & Bin Miao & Yi Duan, 2023. "A Review of Policy Framework Research on Promoting Sustainable Transformation of Digital Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    5. Maria Antonella Ferri & Maria Palazzo, 2018. "Dual marketing communications: Enriching channel value network with a multi-channel strategic communication," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(3), pages 69-83.
    6. Michaela Jackson & Paul Harrison & Boyd Swinburn & Mark Lawrence, 2015. "Marketing ethics in context: the promotion of unhealthy foods and beverages to children," Chapters, in: Handbook on Ethics and Marketing, chapter 17, pages 354-386, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Alexandra Doernberg & Annette Piorr & Ingo Zasada & Dirk Wascher & Ulrich Schmutz, 2022. "Sustainability assessment of short food supply chains (SFSC): developing and testing a rapid assessment tool in one African and three European city regions," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 885-904, September.
    8. Silvius Stanciu & Monica Laura Zlati & Valentin Marian Antohi & Cezar Ionut Bichescu, 2019. "The Development Analysis of the Romanian Traditional Product Market Based on the Performance Model for Sustainable Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-27, February.
    9. Lashgari, Maryam, 2014. "Social Media Technology Deployment in B2B: A Case Study," INDEK Working Paper Series 2014/9, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Industrial Economics and Management.
    10. Thomas, Alban & Lamine, Claire & Allès, Benjamin & Chiffoleau, Yuna & Doré, Antoine & Dubuisson-Quellier, Sophie & Hannachi, Mourad, 2020. "The key roles of economic and social organization and producer and consumer behaviour towards a health-agriculture-food-environment nexus: recent advances and future prospects," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(1), August.
    11. Pinar Ozcan & Douglas Hannah, 2020. "Social Origins of Great Strategies Advertising Suppliers to Realize Disruptive Social Media Technology," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 193-217, September.
    12. Helpris Estaswara, 2016. "Integrated Marketing Communications (Imc) In Higher Education In Indonesia," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 14(1), pages 74-83, December.
    13. Talis Tisenkopfs & Emils Kilis & Mikelis Grivins & Anda Adamsone-Fiskovica, 2019. "Whose ethics and for whom? Dealing with ethical disputes in agri-food governance," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(2), pages 353-364, June.
    14. Cammock, Radilaite & Tonumaipe’a, Daysha & Conn, Cath & Sa’uLilo, Losi & Tautolo, El-Shadan & Nayar, Shoba, 2021. "From individual behaviour strategies to sustainable food systems: Countering the obesity and non communicable diseases epidemic in New Zealand," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 229-238.
    15. Norbert Floriš & Pavol Schwarcz & Loreta Schwarczová & Michal Munk, 2022. "Short Food Supply Chains and Small Farms—Evidence from Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, February.
    16. Nuno Baptista & Helena Alves & Nelson Matos, 2022. "Scoping Challenges and Opportunities Presented by COVID-19 for the Development of Sustainable Short Food Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    17. Tao Zhao & Jung-Mo Koo & Min-Jae Lee, 2022. "How Firms Can Improve Sustainable Performance on Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    18. Andre Deppermann & Petr Havlík & Hugo Valin & Esther Boere & Mario Herrero & Joost Vervoort & Erik Mathijs, 2018. "The market impacts of shortening feed supply chains in Europe," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(6), pages 1401-1410, December.
    19. Enthoven, Laura & Van den Broeck, Goedele, 2021. "Local food systems: Reviewing two decades of research," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    20. Sebastian Kretschmer & Sheena Dehm, 2021. "Sustainability Transitions in University Food Service—A Living Lab Approach of Locavore Meal Planning and Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-31, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    digitalization; local vegetable producers; consumers’ profile; on-line purchase; method of payment; short supply chains; Romania;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:24:y:2022:i:59:p:128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.