IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v26y2022i41514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decolonial Studies, Non-Extractive Methods, and Participatory Action Research in Accounting

Author

Listed:
  • Cleia Maria da Silva
  • Fernanda Filgueiras Sauerbronn
  • Michel Thiollent

Abstract

Objective: this paper discusses how accounting supports financial capitalism in the Global South through neocolonialist languages and practices, aiming to put forth a decolonial agenda based on non-extractive methodologies to recover alternative knowledge and (re)build new ones. Method: we revisited critical accounting literature, connecting it to decolonial epistemology. We described the assumptions behind different non-extractive methods and contrasted participatory action research (PAR) with different approaches to knowledge production and consumption. We also outlined some PAR operational strategies, discussed action research in management and accounting studies, and examined the potential for a participatory accounting agenda. Results: non-extractive methods can respect and value different worldviews in each social phenomenon. This points to non-traditional and emancipatory research alternatives to produce a new sentipensante in accounting to decolonize knowledge, bodies, and minds. Conclusions: this paper presents PAR as allowing (re)existence of different worldviews by recognizing its ability to recover and rebuild knowledge ‘with’ participants. PAR supports programmatic engagement with subalternized voices to coproduce pluriversality in accounting — instead of reproducing universalisms — and bolsters academics and practitioners to transcend Western modernity.

Suggested Citation

  • Cleia Maria da Silva & Fernanda Filgueiras Sauerbronn & Michel Thiollent, 2022. "Decolonial Studies, Non-Extractive Methods, and Participatory Action Research in Accounting," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 26(4), pages 210014-2100.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:26:y:2022:i:4:1514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1514
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1514/1742
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Husillos, Javier, 2023. "Is critique sustainable? A commentary on Bigoni and Mohammed," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:26:y:2022:i:4:1514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.