IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abd/kauiea/v35y2022i1no2p23-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring sharīʿah Compliance Model: Evidence from Islamic Banks in Indonesia نموذج قياس الالتزام الإسلامي: أدلة من البنوك الإسلامية في إندونيسيا

Author

Listed:
  • Ardiansyah Rakhmadi

    (Faculty of Business and Economics, Islamic University of Indonesia, Indonesia)

  • Abdul Ghafar Ismail

    (Faculty of Economics and Muamalat, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia)

  • Achmad Tohirin

    (Faculty of Business and Economics, Islamic University of Indonesia, Indonesia)

  • Jaka Sriyana

    (Faculty of Business and Economics, Islamic University of Indonesia, Indonesia)

Abstract

Measuring the sharīʿah-compliance achievement of Islamic banks is important because the bank products should follow sharīʿah principles. Although some studies have formulated measurement models, most of the models are still conceptual or empirical research but with the partial approach employing only part of sharīʿah-compliance variables such as a contract or maqāṣid al-sharīʿah alone. Therefore, this study attempts to bridge the gap by building a comprehensive model and implementing it to the empirical research in ten Indonesian Islamic Banks by utilizing two sharīʿah compliance variables: the contract and maqāṣid al- sharīʿah simultaneously. In this study, the modeling process used a theory-based method. Afterward, the paper expresses the measurement results in a sharīʿah compliance index. The sharīʿah-compliance index represents a comparison between standard and measurement scores. The study has found that the Bank standard operating procedure (SOP) of the product and its implementation did not fully achieve the model standard scores with the rare frequency of sharīʿah non-compliant events in its practice. يعد قياس جوانب الامتثال الشرعي في البنوك الإسلامية أمرًا مهمًا لأن منتجات البنك يجب أن تتوافق مع مبادئ الشريعة الإسلامية. قامت بعض الدراسات بصياغة نماذج لقياس هذا الالتزام. ومع ذلك، فإن معظمها ما يزال مفاهيميًا أو تجريبيًا مرتبطًا بالمنهج الجزئي باستخدام بعض متغيرات الامتثال مثل العقد أو مقاصد الشريعة. تحاول الدراسة سد الفجوة في هذا الجانب من خلال بناء نموذج شامل وتطبيقه وفق منهج تجريبي على البنوك الإسلامية في إندونيسيا عبر تفعيل متغيرين للامتثال الشرعي هما: العقد ومقاصد الشريعة. وقد تم تطبيق النموذج في عشرة بنوك إسلامية. بُني النموذج على أساس النمذجة القائمة على النظرية. يتم التعبير عن نتائج القياس في شكل مؤشر التوافق مع الشريعة الإسلامية. يمثل مؤشر الامتثال مقارنة بين نتائج المعيار ودرجة القياس. توصلت الدراسة إلى أن إجراءات تنفيذ المنتج في البنوك محل الدراسة لم تحقق بشكل كامل المستوى القياسي للنمذجة على الرغم من ندرة الإجراءات المخالفة للشريعة الإسلامية.

Suggested Citation

  • Ardiansyah Rakhmadi & Abdul Ghafar Ismail & Achmad Tohirin & Jaka Sriyana, 2022. "Measuring sharīʿah Compliance Model: Evidence from Islamic Banks in Indonesia نموذج قياس الالتزام الإسلامي: أدلة من البنوك الإسلامية في إندونيسيا," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 35(1), pages 23-40, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:35:y:2022:i:1:no:2:p:23-40
    DOI: 10.4197/Islec.35-1.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iei.kau.edu.sa/Files/121/Files/153818_35-01-02-Ardiansy-010122.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4197/Islec.35-1.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki & Abdulazeem Abozaid, 2007. "A Critical Appraisal On The Challenges Of Realizing Maqasid Al-Shariaah In Islamic Banking And Finance," IIUM Journal of Economics and Management, IIUM Journal of Economis and Management, vol. 15(2), pages 999-1000, December.
    2. Khan, Feisal, 2010. "How 'Islamic' is Islamic Banking?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 805-820, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shafiullah Jan & M. Fahad Siddiqi & Karim Ullah, 2019. "Maqasid al Shariah and Stakeholders’ Wellbeing in Islamic Banks: A Proposed Framework," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 11(1), pages 83-102, March.
    2. Fredj Jawadi & Abdoulkarim Idi Cheffou & Nabila Jawadi, 2016. "Can the Islamic bank be an emerging leader? A panel data causality analysis," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(14), pages 991-994, September.
    3. Beck, Thorsten & Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli & Merrouche, Ouarda, 2013. "Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 433-447.
    4. Ribed Vianneca W. Jubilee & Fakarudin Kamarudin & Ahmed Razman Abdul Latiff & Hafezali Iqbal Hussain & Khar Mang Tan, 2021. "Do Islamic versus conventional banks progress or regress in productivity level?," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Ibrahim, Mansor H. & Rizvi, Syed Aun R., 2018. "Bank lending, deposits and risk-taking in times of crisis: A panel analysis of Islamic and conventional banks," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 31-47.
    6. Doumpos, Michael & Hasan, Iftekhar & Pasiouras, Fotios, 2017. "Bank overall financial strength: Islamic versus conventional banks," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 513-523.
    7. Izani, Izahairani & Masih, Mansur, 2017. "Do islamic bank deposits depend on total islamic bank assets or the other way around ?," MPRA Paper 106218, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Baele, L. & Farooq, M. & Ongena, S., 2012. "Of Religion and Redemption : Evidence from Default on Islamic Loans (Replaces CentER DP 2010-136)," Other publications TiSEM 44a4a19c-3959-4e99-b96b-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Imam, Patrick & Kpodar, Kangni, 2016. "Islamic banking: Good for growth?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 387-401.
    10. Baele, Lieven & Farooq, Moazzam & Ongena, Steven, 2014. "Of religion and redemption: Evidence from default on Islamic loans," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 141-159.
    11. Syed Abul Basher & Lawrence M. Kessler & Murat K. Munkin, 2017. "Bank capital and portfolio risk among Islamic banks," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(1), pages 1-9, September.
    12. Kader, Haithem, 2021. "Human well-being, morality and the economy: an Islamic perspective," Islamic Economic Studies, The Islamic Research and Training Institute (IRTI), vol. 28, pages 102-123.
    13. Teguh Budiman & Yayan Satyakti & Erie Febrian, 2021. "Islamic Bank Sustainability: An Econometric Approach," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(2), pages 141-159, February.
    14. Sorwar, Ghulam & Pappas, Vasileios & Pereira, John & Nurullah, Mohamed, 2016. "To debt or not to debt: Are Islamic banks less risky than conventional banks?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 132(S), pages 113-126.
    15. Bitar, Mohammad & Hassan, M. Kabir & Saad, Wadad, 2020. "Culture and the capital–performance nexus in dual banking systems," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 34-58.
    16. NEIFAR, Malika & Gharbi, Leila, 2020. "Islamic vs Conventional banks: what differences ? Tunisian case," MPRA Paper 102972, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Ebrahim, M. Shahid & Jaafar, Aziz & Omar, Fatma A. & Salleh, Murizah Osman, 2016. "Can Islamic injunctions indemnify the structural flaws of securitized debt?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 271-286.
    18. Istvan Egresi & Rauf Belge, 2015. "Development Of Islamic Banking In Turkey," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 5-20, December.
    19. Azmat, Saad & Skully, Michael & Brown, Kym, 2017. "The (little) difference that makes all the difference between Islamic and conventional bonds," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 46-59.
    20. Mohamed E. Chaffai, 2022. "New evidence on Islamic and conventional bank efficiency: A meta‐regression analysis," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 221-246, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:35:y:2022:i:1:no:2:p:23-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cikausa.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.