IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v24y2024i8p1065-1079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Actors participation and power relations of REDD+ implementation in Bale Eco Region, Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Aklilu Bekele Chorito
  • Engdawork Assefa

Abstract

The study focuses on actor participation and power dynamics in the REDD+ project within the Bale eco-region, a vital facet of global climate policy for sustainable forest resource management. The Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) of the World Bank supports developing countries in preparing for international REDD+ policy implementation, emphasizing the necessity of effective actor participation. The study uses text documents, Socio metric survey, and interviews with project actors and participants. This study employs both qualitative framework and social network analysis (SNA). While SNA looks at power dynamics and interactions between actors, the qualitative framework allows for a comprehensive evaluation of actor participation. The social network data was analyzed using an open source software called NodeXL. Results show that Bale eco-region REDD+ involves actors from different groups. Actors contribute to national strategies, funding, capacity building, and knowledge sharing. However, local communities have limited involvement in decision-making, lack knowledge sharing and capacity building. This hinders the implementation process and contributes to unequal power dynamics and lack the comprehensive input needed for effective and tailored strategies in the region. Calculated centrality values highlight a strong alliance among Ethiopia's national government entity overseeing REDD+ Environment, Forest and Climate Change Commission (EFCCC), and the regional entities Oromiya Forest and Wildlife Enterprise (OFWI), as well as Farm Africa, indicating significant institutional power across national and local levels. EFCCC holds influence in decision-making and strategy development, while OFWI wields substantial regional institutional power in information control and collaboration. Thus, climate policies must prioritize involvement of local communities in decision-making, capacity development, and resource accessibility. This helps to tackle power imbalances through collaborative governance structures. It also enables stakeholders to actively manage forests through imparting skills, knowledge and share benefits equally.Implementing an inclusive, collaborative approach to governance of any REDD+ initiative creates the conditions for success through legitimate decision making and equitable.Decentralizing decision-making helps to balance power dynamics between powerful stakeholders and weaker stakeholders.Involving the private sector is recommended to enhance investment coordination for REDD+ development and mitigate potential negative impacts.Successfully implementing climate policy depends on leveraging current structures, adjusting engagement to local contexts, and fostering ongoing dialogue.

Suggested Citation

  • Aklilu Bekele Chorito & Engdawork Assefa, 2024. "Actors participation and power relations of REDD+ implementation in Bale Eco Region, Ethiopia," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(8), pages 1065-1079, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:24:y:2024:i:8:p:1065-1079
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2024.2322962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2024.2322962
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2024.2322962?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:24:y:2024:i:8:p:1065-1079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.