IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0170284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patterns of Contraceptive Adoption, Continuation, and Switching after Delivery among Malawian Women

Author

Listed:
  • Dawn M Kopp
  • Nora E Rosenberg
  • Gretchen S Stuart
  • William C Miller
  • Mina C Hosseinipour
  • Phylos Bonongwe
  • Mwawi Mwale
  • Jennifer H Tang

Abstract

Women who report use of postpartum family planning may not continue their initial method or use it consistently. Understanding the patterns of method uptake, discontinuation, and switching among women after delivery is important to promote uptake and continuation of effective methods of contraception. This is a secondary analysis of 634 Malawian women enrolled into a prospective cohort study after delivery. They completed baseline surveys upon enrollment and follow-up telephone surveys 3, 6, and 12 months post-delivery. Women were included in this analysis if they had completed at least the 3- and 6-month post-delivery surveys. Descriptive statistics were used to assess contraceptive method mix and patterns of switching, whereas Pearson’s χ2 tests were used for bivariable analyses to compare characteristics of women who continued and discontinued their initial post-delivery contraceptive method. Among the 479 women included in this analysis, the use of abstinence/traditional methods decreased and the use of long-acting and permanent methods (LAPM) increased over time. Almost half (47%) discontinued the contraceptive method reported at 3-months post-delivery; women using injectables or LAPM at 3-months post-delivery were significantly more likely to continue their method than those using non-modern methods (p

Suggested Citation

  • Dawn M Kopp & Nora E Rosenberg & Gretchen S Stuart & William C Miller & Mina C Hosseinipour & Phylos Bonongwe & Mwawi Mwale & Jennifer H Tang, 2017. "Patterns of Contraceptive Adoption, Continuation, and Switching after Delivery among Malawian Women," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0170284
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0170284
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0170284&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0170284?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0170284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.