IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v49y2019i3p437-464..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medicaid Expansion during the Trump Presidency: The Role of Executive Waivers, State Ballot Measures, and Attorney General Lawsuits in Shaping Intergovernmental Relations

Author

Listed:
  • Lilliard E RichardsonJr

Abstract

This article assesses developments in the first two years of the Trump presidency regarding implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), with a focus on Medicaid policy. Trump administration officials relied on executive actions to chip away at various elements of the ACA and encouraged and granted state requests for waivers allowing work-requirements and other personal-responsibility rules for Medicaid beneficiaries. Governors and state attorneys general were actively involved in lawsuits that led to several federal court rulings blocking implementation of Medicaid work requirements as well as a ruling that re-opened the legitimacy of the entire ACA. Citizens and interest groups had a major impact at the ballot box by approving several ballot measures that expanded Medicaid in states where expansion was opposed by elected officials. These developments demonstrate how policy adjustments and disputes are worked out in the U.S. federal system in a polarized era, with Congress essentially a bystander and other institutions and actors coming to the fore and resulting in variable speed federalism characterized by different partisan trajectories of state implementation of national policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Lilliard E RichardsonJr, 2019. "Medicaid Expansion during the Trump Presidency: The Role of Executive Waivers, State Ballot Measures, and Attorney General Lawsuits in Shaping Intergovernmental Relations," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 49(3), pages 437-464.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:49:y:2019:i:3:p:437-464.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjz016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:49:y:2019:i:3:p:437-464.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.