Author
Listed:
- Alexandra Tikidji-Hamburyan
(University of Tübingen
University of Tübingen
Stanford University)
- Katja Reinhard
(University of Tübingen
University of Tübingen
IMEC, KU Leuven and VIB)
- Riccardo Storchi
(University of Manchester)
- Johannes Dietter
(University of Tübingen)
- Hartwig Seitter
(University of Tübingen
University of Tübingen
University of Innsbruck)
- Katherine E. Davis
(University of Manchester)
- Saad Idrees
(University of Tübingen
University of Tübingen)
- Marion Mutter
(University of Tübingen
University of Tübingen)
- Lauren Walmsley
(University of Manchester)
- Robert A. Bedford
(University of Manchester
Stryker Imorphics, Worthington House)
- Marius Ueffing
(University of Tübingen)
- Petri Ala-Laurila
(University of Helsinki
Aalto University School of Science and Technology)
- Timothy M. Brown
(University of Manchester)
- Robert J. Lucas
(University of Manchester)
- Thomas A. Münch
(University of Tübingen
University of Tübingen)
Abstract
Rod and cone photoreceptors support vision across large light intensity ranges. Rods, active under dim illumination, are thought to saturate at higher (photopic) irradiances. The extent of rod saturation is not well defined; some studies report rod activity well into the photopic range. Using electrophysiological recordings from retina and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of cone-deficient and visually intact mice, we describe stimulus and physiological factors that influence photopic rod-driven responses. We find that rod contrast sensitivity is initially strongly reduced at high irradiances, but progressively recovers to allow responses to moderate contrast stimuli. Surprisingly, rods recover faster at higher light levels. A model of rod phototransduction suggests that phototransduction gain adjustments and bleaching adaptation underlie rod recovery. Consistently, exogenous chromophore reduces rod responses at bright background. Thus, bleaching adaptation renders mouse rods responsive to modest contrast at any irradiance. Paradoxically, raising irradiance across the photopic range increases the robustness of rod responses.
Suggested Citation
Alexandra Tikidji-Hamburyan & Katja Reinhard & Riccardo Storchi & Johannes Dietter & Hartwig Seitter & Katherine E. Davis & Saad Idrees & Marion Mutter & Lauren Walmsley & Robert A. Bedford & Marius U, 2017.
"Rods progressively escape saturation to drive visual responses in daylight conditions,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-017-01816-6
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01816-6
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-017-01816-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.