Author
Listed:
- Delphine Lemaçon
(Saint Louis University School of Medicine)
- Jessica Jackson
(Saint Louis University School of Medicine)
- Annabel Quinet
(Saint Louis University School of Medicine)
- Joshua R. Brickner
(Washington University School of Medicine)
- Shan Li
(Washington University School of Medicine)
- Stephanie Yazinski
(Harvard Medical School)
- Zhongsheng You
(Washington University School of Medicine)
- Grzegorz Ira
(Baylor College of Medicine)
- Lee Zou
(Harvard Medical School)
- Nima Mosammaparast
(Washington University School of Medicine)
- Alessandro Vindigni
(Saint Louis University School of Medicine)
Abstract
The breast cancer susceptibility proteins BRCA1 and BRCA2 have emerged as key stabilizing factors for the maintenance of replication fork integrity following replication stress. In their absence, stalled replication forks are extensively degraded by the MRE11 nuclease, leading to chemotherapeutic sensitivity. Here we report that BRCA proteins prevent nucleolytic degradation by protecting replication forks that have undergone fork reversal upon drug treatment. The unprotected regressed arms of reversed forks are the entry point for MRE11 in BRCA-deficient cells. The CtIP protein initiates MRE11-dependent degradation, which is extended by the EXO1 nuclease. Next, we show that the initial limited resection of the regressed arms establishes the substrate for MUS81 in BRCA2-deficient cells. In turn, MUS81 cleavage of regressed forks with a ssDNA tail promotes POLD3-dependent fork rescue. We propose that targeting this pathway may represent a new strategy to modulate BRCA2-deficient cancer cell response to chemotherapeutics that cause fork degradation.
Suggested Citation
Delphine Lemaçon & Jessica Jackson & Annabel Quinet & Joshua R. Brickner & Shan Li & Stephanie Yazinski & Zhongsheng You & Grzegorz Ira & Lee Zou & Nima Mosammaparast & Alessandro Vindigni, 2017.
"MRE11 and EXO1 nucleases degrade reversed forks and elicit MUS81-dependent fork rescue in BRCA2-deficient cells,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-017-01180-5
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01180-5
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:8:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-017-01180-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.