IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/complx/9496152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Effect of VR + Haptics Approach on Students’ Flow Experience and Outcomes: An Empirical Study on VR Laparoscopy

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Shen
  • Zhaoxue Wang
  • Aimin Hao
  • Peng Yu
  • Xuesong Zhai
  • Haipeng Wang
  • Muhammad Javaid

Abstract

Background. Virtual reality-based surgery training has become a promising trend in the sector of clinical education. Prior studies have confirmed the effectiveness of VR-based surgical simulators on training surgeons. Most existing papers employing subjective methods explored the students’ overall perceptions of surgical skills. However, few studies, from the multidimension perspective of learning performance, investigate how VR improves surgery skills. Participants. 37 college students were recruited in comparative experimental research. The experimental group was equipped with a VR + haptic surgical simulator, while the VR simulator without haptic feedback was used for the control group. Method. The study resorted to physiological approaches to investigate the influence of the VR laparoscopic surgical training system on students’ performance. Results. The experimental group scored higher than the control group in flow experience and has better performance in the four dimensions of operation evaluation skills. Conclusion. The study deposited that learners are more likely to exert to flow experience in a learning situation with haptic feedback, which will further improve medical students’ performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Shen & Zhaoxue Wang & Aimin Hao & Peng Yu & Xuesong Zhai & Haipeng Wang & Muhammad Javaid, 2021. "Investigating the Effect of VR + Haptics Approach on Students’ Flow Experience and Outcomes: An Empirical Study on VR Laparoscopy," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-10, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:complx:9496152
    DOI: 10.1155/2021/9496152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/complexity/2021/9496152.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/complexity/2021/9496152.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2021/9496152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:complx:9496152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.