IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5488-d1102674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation on Seismic Performance of the Fully Assembled Steel Frame Applying Beam-Column Joints with Replaceable Energy-Dissipating Elements

Author

Listed:
  • Dawei Zhang

    (Shanghai Pudong Architectural Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201206, China)

  • Yuanqi Li

    (College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Binhui Huang

    (Shanghai Pudong Architectural Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201206, China)

Abstract

Based on the application of a beam-column joint with replaceable energy-dissipating elements and hinged beam-column proposed by the author, the seismic performance of a fully assembled steel frame with this joint was investigated in this paper. Through two projects of a traditional steel frame (TSF) and an assembled steel frame applying beam-column joints with replaceable energy-dissipating elements (ASFWREE) and their numerical simulation calculation by SAP2000, the main structural design indicators such as natural vibration period, period ratio, mass participation coefficient, base shear force, inter-story displacement angle, rigid-weight ratio, and shear-weight ratio of two frames under frequent earthquake, and their influence factors were compared and analyzed. By carrying out the elastic–plastic dynamic time–history analysis of two projects under a rare earthquake, the maximum inter-story displacement angle, base shear force, stiffness between floors, maximum vertex displacement, and the occurrence sequence and distribution of plastic hinges of the two items were compared. The results show that the deformation of ASFWREE had the characteristics of the shear deformation of TSF and the deviation of the natural vibration period was less than 5% when the ratio of the linear stiffness of the energy-dissipating element to the steel beam was approximately 0.8, the ratio of horizontal length to span was about 0.25, which was close to the strength grade of the steel beam. The seismic performance under the rare earthquake was close to or higher to that of the TSF, can ensure that the beam and column are not damaged, and the structure does not collapse. The failure mode of the ASFWREE is consistent with the experimental research of the beam-column joints.

Suggested Citation

  • Dawei Zhang & Yuanqi Li & Binhui Huang, 2023. "Investigation on Seismic Performance of the Fully Assembled Steel Frame Applying Beam-Column Joints with Replaceable Energy-Dissipating Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5488-:d:1102674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5488/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5488/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuanqi Li & Binhui Huang, 2022. "Evaluation on Seismic Performance of Beam-Column Joints of Fabricated Steel Structure with Replaceable Energy-Dissipating Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zibin Zhao & Yu Zhang, 2023. "Seismic Performance Comparison of Three-Type 800 m Spherical Mega-Latticed Structure City Domes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Zhang & Wei Ma & Xin Li & Kai Li, 2022. "Experimental Research on Seismic Behavior of Haunched Concrete Beam–Column Joint Based on the Bolt Connection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5488-:d:1102674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.