IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11771-d1207102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the Widths of Fault Damage Zones Based on the Fault Likelihood: A Case Study of Faults in the Fuji Syncline of the Luzhou Block, Sichuan Basin, China

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Zeng

    (Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Processes, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610299, China)

  • Jinxi Li

    (Key Laboratory of Earth Exploration and Information Technology of Ministry of Education, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Shihu Wu

    (Exploration and Development Research Institution of Southwest Oilfield Branch of China Petroleum Company, Chengdu 610041, China)

  • Kailin Tong

    (Sichuan Shale Gas Exploration and Development Company Limited, Chengdu 610051, China)

  • Zhiwu Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

Abstract

Faults are critical to the preservation or destruction of shale gas concentration. The Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the southern Sichuan Basin hosts relatively developed faults, which pose a huge challenge to the exploration and exploitation of shale gas. An urgent need to quickly determine the widths of fault damage zones (FDZs) arises in locating horizontal shale gas wells. In this study, FDZs were estimated using the fault likelihood. The results are as follows: (1) It is rational to constrain the FDZ width using a fault likelihood greater than 0.2. The six major NEE-trending faults in the Fuji syncline of the Luzhou block have complex structures and varying FDZ widths from about 240–1220 m. (2) The degree of influence of FDZs is negatively correlated with their distance from the faults. In other words, a greater distance from a fault is associated with a weaker influence and a smaller fault likelihood. (3) Based on the ratio of the fault throw to the FDZ width, we propose that the width of seismic-scale fault damages can be directly constrained using a ratio value of 3.5. This method is fast and accurate and can provide support for the evaluation of the shale gas preservation conditions and well placement in the Longmaxi Formation of the southern Sichuan Basin.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Zeng & Jinxi Li & Shihu Wu & Kailin Tong & Zhiwu Li, 2023. "Quantifying the Widths of Fault Damage Zones Based on the Fault Likelihood: A Case Study of Faults in the Fuji Syncline of the Luzhou Block, Sichuan Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11771-:d:1207102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11771/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11771/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11771-:d:1207102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.