IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11457-d1201341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost Optimization of Prestressed U-Shaped Simply Supported Girder Using Box Complex Method

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Salman Khan

    (College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Tianbo Peng

    (College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Syed Muhammad Ali

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan)

  • Faisal Ur Rehman

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan)

  • Yicheng Wu

    (College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

The use of U-shaped girders has become increasingly popular in advanced projects such as metro rail systems due to their ability to provide greater vertical clearance beneath bridges. These girders, characterized by two webs and a bottom flange, contribute essential longitudinal stiffness and strength to the overall structure while effectively countering torsional forces in curved bridges. However, the design and construction of U-shaped girders present challenges, including their relatively higher self-weight compared to other girder types. Consequently, cost optimization has become a crucial focus in structural design studies. This research aims to develop an optimization model for prestressed U-shaped girders using the AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. The model is based on the Box complex method, with necessary modifications and improvements to achieve an optimal design. The objective is to minimize the total cost of materials, including concrete, steel reinforcement, and prestressing strands, while satisfying explicit and implicit design constraints. To facilitate the analysis, design, and optimization processes, a program is developed using Visual Studio 2010 and implemented in Visual Basic (VB.NET). The program incorporates separate subroutines for analysis, design, and optimization of the prestressed U-shaped girder, which are integrated to produce the desired results. When running the program, the optimization process required 229 iterations to converge to the optimal cost function value. The results demonstrate that the developed algorithm efficiently explores economically and structurally effective solutions, resulting in cost savings compared to the initial design. The convergence rate of the moment capacity constraint is identified as a key factor in achieving the optimal design. This research makes a significant contribution to the field of civil engineering by applying the classical Box complex method to the optimization of girders, an area where its utilization has been limited. Furthermore, this study specifically addresses the optimization of prestressed U-shaped girders in metro rail projects, where they serve as both the deck and support structure for train loading. By employing the Box complex method, this research aims to fill the research gap and provide valuable insights into the optimization of U-shaped girders. This approach offers a fresh perspective on designing these girders, considering their unique role in supporting metro rail loads. By leveraging the benefits of the Box complex method, researchers can explore new possibilities and uncover optimal design solutions for U-shaped girders in metro rail applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Salman Khan & Tianbo Peng & Syed Muhammad Ali & Faisal Ur Rehman & Yicheng Wu, 2023. "Cost Optimization of Prestressed U-Shaped Simply Supported Girder Using Box Complex Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11457-:d:1201341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11457/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11457/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11457-:d:1201341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.