IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p606-d1019242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of the Autonomous Use of Technology for Language Learning for EFL University Students of Different Proficiency Levels

Author

Listed:
  • Li-Tang Yu

    (Department of English Instruction, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City 300193, Taiwan)

Abstract

Different aspects of second-language learners’ autonomous use of technology for language learning have been investigated and its positive effects on language learning have been reported. However, there is a paucity of research on whether language learners’ different proficiency levels are associated with their perceptions of their own autonomous use of technology-enhanced language learning (TELL). Therefore, this study examines the autonomous use of TELL outside the English classes of English learners of different proficiency levels. Ninety-nine EFL college students (47 of lower proficiency and 52 of higher proficiency) in northern Taiwan took a survey on the autonomous use of TELL. The results demonstrated that students’ proficiency levels did not relate to the involvement of autonomous use of technology for language learning. Nearly one-third of all students did not take on autonomous English learning via technology outside class. The students in both groups tended towards more receptive-skill English learning activities than productive-skill activities in their autonomous use of technology, whereas the students of higher proficiency attended more productive-skill activities than those of lower proficiency. In order for students to benefit from the autonomous use of technology for language learning, proper support and guidance from instructors are crucial.

Suggested Citation

  • Li-Tang Yu, 2022. "A Comparison of the Autonomous Use of Technology for Language Learning for EFL University Students of Different Proficiency Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:606-:d:1019242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/606/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/606/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li-Tang Yu & Mei-Ching Chen & Chao-Wen Chiu & Chien-Che Hsu & Yun-Pi Yuan, 2022. "Examining English Ability-Grouping Practices by Aligning CEFR Levels with University-Level General English Courses in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:606-:d:1019242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.