The welfare reform bill adopted in the United States in 1996 limited immigrants' eligibility for government assistance programs. In fact, early estimates projected that nearly half of the savings associated with the 1996 reforms would come from eligibility restrictions placed on immigrants. Moreover, it has been argued that the intense political debate surrounding the eligibility of immigrants for government assistance and a misunderstanding of the so-called "public charge" rule caused immigrants not to apply for assistance, even if eligible, for fear of difficulties with naturalization or even deportation. This study investigates these issues by examining changes in welfare participation following the 1996 reforms. The authors compare changes for immigrants with natives to gage the differential impact of the reforms on immigrants. It is found that participation in Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)/Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), Food Stamps, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and Medicaid fell faster for immigrants than natives. However, this finding can be explained by the fact that immigrants were located in labor markets that experienced more rapid growth during the post-reform period. After adjusting for differences in local labor market conditions, including disparities in the responsiveness of immigrants to fluctuations in the economy, evidence that participation declined faster for immigrants is weakened substantially. The only exception to this conclusion is the pattern of estimates in California, where the relative decline in AFDC/TANF does not appear to be explained by improvements in local economic conditions.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by RAND Corporation Publications Department in its series Working Papers with number
01-13.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Benson Wong).
Related research
Keywords:
Other versions of this item:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)