This paper examines the strategic promotion and wage decisions of employers when employees may be more valuable to competing firms, even in the presence of firm specific human capital. Competing employers must incur a cost to learn the quality of their match with a manager. Because promotion signal that workers are potentially valuable managers in other firms, it can induce turnover. To preempt competition for a promoted worker, an employer may offer a wage so high that it discourages competitors from acquiring information and bidding up the wage further or hiring the worker away. Also, to avoid competition, employers will fail to promote some less well-matched workers who should be promoted.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Queen's University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number
817.
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Damiano, Ettore & Li, Hao & Suen, Wing, 2006.
"Competing for Talents,"
Micro Theory Working Papers
damiano-06-01-17-02-01-48, Microeconomics.ca Website, revised 17 Jan 2006.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Ettore Damiano & Hao Li & Wing Suen, 2005.
"Competing for Talents,"
Working Papers
tecipa-220, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Carolyn Pitchik & Aloysius Siow, 1997.
"Self-Promoting Investments,"
Working Papers
pitchik-97-01, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Jeremy I. Bulow & Paul D. Klemperer, 2007.
"When are Auctions Best?,"
NBER Working Papers
13268, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Jeremy Bulow & Paul Klemperer, 2007.
"When are Auctions Best?,"
Economics Papers
2007-W03, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
[Downloadable!]
Bulow, Jeremy I. & Klemperer, Paul D., 2007.
"When Are Auctions Best?,"
Research Papers
1973, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
[Downloadable!]
Benoit Julien & John Kennes & Ian King, 2000.
"Bidding for Labor,"
Review of Economic Dynamics,
Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 3(4), pages 619-649, October.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Julien, B. & Kennes, J. & King, I., 1998.
"Bidding for Labour,"
Discussion Papers
dp98-03, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.