This paper studies the determination of split if gains among the negotiating parties (member countries and the acceding country) in a WTO accession negotiation using a sequential bargaining model. In particular, we are interested in the effect of the most-favoured-nation (MFN) principle on the negotiation outcome. The MFN principle says that any tariff reduction offered by the applicant for accession has to be automatically granted to all existing members. This implies that any deal that an applicant, such as China, makes with a member can be made more unfavourable to China in subsequent negotiations. On the other hand, since China has the foresight that giving up each dollar to one country means giving up many dollars, this would harden China’s bargaining position. Resorting to intuition alone, therefore, it is not clear whether China would benefit or be disadvantaged by the existence of MFN. Using the model, however we find unambiguously that China’s share of surplus is more when MFN is in place.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by East Asian Bureau of Economic Research in its series Trade Working Papers with number
164.
Length: 13 pages Date of creation: Oct 2002 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:eab:tradew:164
Contact details of provider: Postal: JG Crawford Building #13, Asia Pacific School of Economics and Government, Australian National University, ACT 0200 Web page: http://www.eaber.org More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Sam Engele).
Find related papers by JEL classification: D0 - Microeconomics - - General F1 - International Economics - - Trade
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Rodney Ludema (Georgetown University) and Anna Maria Mayda (Georgetown University and CEPR), .
"Do Countries Free Ride on MFN?,"
Working Papers
gueconwpa~05-05-13, Georgetown University, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]