This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Affordability of Medicines and Patients' Cost-Reducing Behaviour: Empirical Evidence Based on SUR Estimates from Italy and the UK

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Vincenzo Atella (Centre of International Studies on Economic Growth (CEIS) - Dipartimento di Studi Economico-Finanziari e Metodi Quantitativi (SEFEMEQ), Faculty of Economics, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy)
Ellen Schafheutle (School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK)
Peter Noyce (School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK)
Karen Hassell (School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Introduction: Studies have demonstrated that co-payments on medication reduce the consumption of both non-essential and essential drugs, and that the latter can lead to worse health outcomes. Far less is known about how patients cope with the cost of medication, particularly if affordability is an issue, and how this compares across two countries with different prescription charge policies. Therefore, the aim of this article is to explore empirically how, and to what extent, costs incurred by patients influence their decision-making behaviour in accessing medicines. Methods: Based on the findings from focus groups, a questionnaire was designed that addressed medication cost issues relevant to patients in both the UK and Italy. Using an econometric model, several hypotheses are tested regarding patients' decision-making behaviour and how it is influenced by health status, sociodemographic characteristics and the novel concept of a self-rated affordability measure. Results: Quite a large percentage of patients (70.3% in the UK and 66.5% in Italy) stated they have to think about the cost of medicines at least sometimes. Respondents adopted numerous cost-reducing strategies, subdivided into (i) those initiated by patients and (ii) those involving self-medication. Their use was strongly influenced by income and drug affordability problems, but the self-rated affordability measure was a stronger predictor. Commonly used strategies were not to get prescribed drugs dispensed at all, prioritising by not getting all prescribed items dispensed or delaying until the respondent got paid. Furthermore, respondents with affordability issues were also cost-conscious when self-medicating with over-the-counter (OTC) products for minor conditions such as dyspepsia. Despite patients in both countries using cost-reducing strategies, their use was more pronounced in the UK, where the prescription charge was significantly higher than in Italy. Discussion/conclusion: The results from this study provide detail on the kinds of strategies patients use to reduce the cost burden of prescription charges, and support previous research showing they may be foregoing essential medication. Because the same questionnaire was applied in two European countries, where the national health systems aim to provide healthcare services that are accessible to all citizens in need, it offers interesting insights for policy makers in other countries, where patients may have to pay a larger share of their drugs out-of-pocket, such as the US.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://healtheconomics.adisonline.com/pt/re/ahe/pdfhandler.00148365-200504010-00005.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: Pay per view
File URL: http://healtheconomics.adisonline.com/pt/re/ahe/fulltext.00148365-200504010-00005.htm
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: Pay per view

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Wolters Kluwer Health | Adis in its journal Applied Health Economics and Health Policy.

Volume (Year): 4 (2005)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 23-35
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:wkh:aheahp:v:4:y:2005:i:1:p:23-35

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://diseasemanagement.adisonline.com/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Remco Bouckaert).

Related research
Keywords: Cost-allocation Health-policy Healthcare-expenditure

Find related papers by JEL classification:
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods
D - Microeconomics
I - Health, Education, and Welfare
Z - Other Special Topics
I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health
I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other
I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? The RePEc project started in 1997. Its precursor, NetEc, dates back to 1993.

This page was last updated on 2008-12-29.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.