This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Solow and the states: New evidence

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Steven Yamarik

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Yamarik S. (2006) Solow and the states: new evidence, Regional Studies 40 , 571--582. The aim of this study is to reassess the sources behind US state-level growth during the post-war period. It improves upon the existing literature (1) by using a general method-of-moments (GMM) estimator that eliminates omitted variable and endogeneity bias, (2) by allowing for parameter heterogeneity, and (3) by extending the sample to the pre- and post-productivity slowdown periods. Unlike previous regional growth studies, the paper supports both predictions of neoclassical growth theory. First, strong evidence of convergence in state-level growth rates is found. Second, the rate of convergence and capital share are inversely related. Moreover, numerical computations show that the estimated values for the convergence rate and capital share are consistent with the neoclassical growth model. Yamarik S. (2006) Solow et les Etats: de nouvelles preuves, Regional Studies 40 , 571--582. Cette étude cherche à réévaluer les origines de la croissance aux Etats-Unis sur le plan des états pendant la période d'après-guerre. On développe la documentation existante (1) en utilisant une estimation du type GMM qui élimine la distorsion due aux variables exclues et endogènes, (2) en tenant compte des paramètres hétérogènes et (3) en étendant l'échantillon aux périodes de ralentissement de la productivité d'avant et d'après-guerre. A la différence des études antérieures sur la croissance régionale, le présent article soutient les deux prédictions de la théorie de croissance classique. Dans un premier temps, il s'avère de fortes preuves en faveur de la convergence des taux de croissance sur le plan des états. Dans un deuxième temps, le taux de convergence et le partage des capitaux se rapportent de façon inversement proportionnelle. Qui plus est, les calculs numériques montrent que les estimations du taux de convergence et de la part du capital correspondent au modèle de croissance néo-classique. Croissance régionale  Convergence  Enquête permanente  GMM   Yamarik S. (2006) Solow und die Staaten: neue Beweise, Regional Studies 40 , 571--582. Diese Untersuchung beabsichtigt, die Quellen neu zu beurteilen, die in der Nachkriegszeit hinter dem Wachstum der USA auf Staatenebene zu beobachten waren. Verbesserungen der bereits vorhandenen Literatur werden dadurch erreicht, daß: 1. ein GMM Berechner eingesetzt wird, der bisher ausgelassene veränderliche und endogenetische Voreingenommenheit ausschaltet, 2. Rahmenheterogenität berücksichtigt,und 3. die Stichprobe auf Perioden vor und nach der verlangsamten Leistung ausdehnt. Anders als frühere Untersuchungen regionalen Wachstums tritt dieser Aufsatz für beide Vorhersagen der neo-klassischen Wachstumstheorie ein. Erstens gibt es kräftige Beweise der Konvergenz von Wachstumsraten auf überregionaler Ebene. Zweitens stehen die Raten der Konvergenz und des Kapitalanteils in umgekehrter Beziehung zueinander. Darüberhinaus zeigen zahlenmäßige Berechnumgen, daß die berechneten Werte für die Konvergenzrate und den Kapitalanteil mit dem neo-klassischen Wachstumsmodell übereinstimmen. Regionales Wachstum  Konvergenz  Datenliste  GMM Yamarik S. (2006) Solow y los Estados: nueva evidencia, Regional Studies 40 , 571--582. La finalidad de este estudio es reexaminar las fuentes del crecimiento a nivel estatal en los Estados Unidos durante la era de la posguerra. Basándonos en la literatura presente obtenemos mejores resultados porque (1) usamos un estimador GMM que elimina el sesgo debido a variables omitidas y endogeneidad, (2) tenemos en cuenta el carácter heterogéneo de los parámetros y (3) ampliamos la muestra a los periodos anterior y posterior a la disminución de la productividad. A diferencia de estudios anteriores sobre el crecimiento regional, aquí apoyamos las dos predicciones de la teoría neoclásica del crecimiento. En primer lugar, hallamos sólidas pruebas de convergencia en las tasas de crecimiento en un ámbito estatal. En segundo lugar, la tasa de convergencia y el porcentaje de capital están inversamente relacionados. Además, las computaciones numéricas muestran que los valores estimados para la tasa de convergencia y el porcentaje de capital son coherentes con el modelo de crecimiento neoclásico. Crecimiento regional  Convergencia  Datos del panel  GMM

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=U2X1NT1133V56384
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Taylor and Francis Journals in its journal Regional Studies.

Volume (Year): 40 (2006)
Issue (Month): 6 (August)
Pages: 571-582
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:6:p:571-582

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=104661

Order Information:
Web: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/subscription.html

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords: Regional growth; Convergence; Panel data; General method-of-moments (GMM);

Other versions of this item:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Arellano, Manuel & Bond, Stephen, 1991. "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations," Review of Economic Studies, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 58(2), pages 277-97, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Johnson, Paul A., 2000. "A nonparametric analysis of income convergence across the US states," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 219-223, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  3. Bruce E. Hansen, 2000. "Sample Splitting and Threshold Estimation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 575-604, May.
    Other versions:
  4. Azariadis, Costas & Drazen, Allan, 1990. "Threshold Externalities in Economic Development," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 105(2), pages 501-26, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Danny Quah, 1992. "Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth," Discussion Paper / Institute for Empirical Macroeconomics 75, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  6. Caselli, Francesco & Esquivel, Gerardo & Lefort, Fernando, 1996. " Reopening the Convergence Debate: A New Look at Cross-Country Growth Empirics," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 363-89, September.
  7. Ortigueira, Salvador & Santos, Manuel S, 1997. "On the Speed of Convergence in Endogenous Growth Models," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(3), pages 383-99, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Pugno, Maurizio, 1996. "Structural Stability in a Cross-Country Neoclassical Growth Model," Applied Economics, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 28(12), pages 1555-66, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Michael Funke & Annekatrin Niebuhr, 2005. "Regional Geographic Research and Development Spillovers and Economic Growth: Evidence from West Germany," Regional Studies, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 143-153, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  10. Paul Evans, 1997. "How Fast Do Economies Converge?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 79(2), pages 219-225, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  11. Barro, R.J. & Mankiw, N.G. & Sala-i-Martin, X., 1992. "Capital Mobility in Neoclassical Models of Growth," Papers 655, Yale - Economic Growth Center.
    Other versions:
  12. Mankiw, N Gregory & Romer, David & Weil, David N, 1992. "A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 107(2), pages 407-37, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  13. Barro, R.J. & Sala-I-Martin, X., 1991. "Convergence," Papers 645, Yale - Economic Growth Center.
    Other versions:
  14. repec:att:wimass:199419r is not listed on IDEAS
  15. Ronald Moomaw & J. Mullen & Martin Williams, 2002. "Human and knowledge capital: A contribution to the empirics of state economic growth," Atlantic Economic Journal, International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 30(1), pages 48-60, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  16. Gasper A. Garofalo & Steven Yamarik, 2002. "Regional Convergence: Evidence From A New State-By-State Capital Stock Series," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 84(2), pages 316-323, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  17. Bernard, Andrew B & Jones, Charles I, 1996. "Productivity and Convergence across U.S. States and Industries," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 113-35.
  18. Gerald Carlino & Leonard Mills, 1994. "Convergence and the U.S states: a time series analysis," Working Papers 94-13, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
  19. Somik V. Lall & Serdar Yilmaz, 2001. "Regional economic convergence: Do policy instruments make a difference?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 153-166. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  20. Serge Coulombe, 2003. "Human Capital, Urbanization and Canadian Provincial Growth," Regional Studies, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 239-250, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  21. Islam, Nazrul, 1995. "Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 110(4), pages 1127-70, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  22. Jonathan R. W. Temple, 1998. "Robustness tests of the augmented Solow model," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(4), pages 361-375. [Downloadable!]
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS indexes over 800000 items of research in Economics alone.

This page was last updated on 2009-10-29.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.