Since Amartya Sen's contribution on the impossibility of a Paretian liberal, his formulation of libertarian rights has been under debate. In this paper, the authors highlight some important strands in this debate, and achieve some conceptual clarification of the different and often incompatible views of individual rights. They demonstrate in terms of a counterexample and general reasoning that Sen's concept can, more often than not, be inconsistent with our intuitive view of rights and fails to capture important categories of rights. An alternative formulation in terms of game form is introduced and its relative merit vis-a-vis Sen's formulation is discussed. Copyright 1992 by The London School of Economics and Political Science.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Article provided by London School of Economics and Political Science in its journal Economica.
Volume (Year): 59 (1992) Issue (Month): 234 (May) Pages: 161-77 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
BLACKORBY, Charles & BOSSERT, Walter & DONALDSON, David, 2002.
"In Defense of Welfarism,"
Cahiers de recherche
2002-02, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Blackorby, C. & Bossert, W. & Donaldson, D., 2002.
"In Defense of Welfarism,"
Cahiers de recherche
02-2002, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
[Downloadable!]
Maskin, Eric & Sjostrom, Tomas, 2001.
"Implementation Theory,"
Working Papers
5-01-1, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Maskin, Eric & Sjostrom, Tomas, 2002.
"Implementation theory,"
Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare,
in: K. J. Arrow & A. K. Sen & K. Suzumura (ed.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 5, pages 237-288
Elsevier.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)