We compare two approaches for estimating the distribution of consumers' willingness to pay ("WTP") in discrete choice models. The usual procedure is to estimate the distribution of the utility coefficients and then derive the distribution of "WTP", which is the ratio of coefficients. The alternative is to estimate the distribution of "WTP" directly. We apply both approaches to data on site choice in the Alps. We find that the alternative approach fits the data better, reduces the incidence of exceedingly large estimated "WTP" values, and provides the analyst with greater control in specifying and testing the distribution of "WTP". Copyright Copyright 2008 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 90 (2008) Issue (Month): 4 (November) Pages: 994-1010 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)